On Jan 10, 2008 10:00 PM, David Krings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I gave up on phpMyAdmin a long time ago and use the tools from the MySQL
> website. I'd give those a try and see if that gives you more command.
i figured it out. it was something really dumb. i didn't have the
right username/pas
Randal Rust wrote:
I installed MySQL 5 on a machine, and had nothing but problems with
it. So I rolled back to MySQL 4.0.24. Now I can't create new databases
through PHPMyAdmin. When I look at the PHPMyAdmin home page, it says
I'm connected to:
MySQL 4.0.24-nt running on localhost as [EMAIL PROT
I installed MySQL 5 on a machine, and had nothing but problems with
it. So I rolled back to MySQL 4.0.24. Now I can't create new databases
through PHPMyAdmin. When I look at the PHPMyAdmin home page, it says
I'm connected to:
MySQL 4.0.24-nt running on localhost as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It should be
Its also good to scan the last php-internals list and grep for
Namespaces discussions as things can automagically change on you :-)
http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=118355320225178&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=119308858512331&w=2
- Jon
On Jan 10, 2008, at 8:07 PM, David Krings w
Thanks to all who responded to my request for suggestions on
WYSIWYG editors.
Urb
Dr. Urban A. LeJeune, President
E-Government.com
609-294-0320 800-204-9545
~
E-Government.com lowers you costs while increasing your expectations.
Kristina Anderson wrote:
I think this has something to do with variable scope? Such as, in ASP
(like VB), if you declare a variable i within a function, it loses
scope after the function executes and you can have another variable i
outside a function which stays in scope (this is NOT necessari
I think this has something to do with variable scope? Such as, in ASP
(like VB), if you declare a variable i within a function, it loses
scope after the function executes and you can have another variable i
outside a function which stays in scope (this is NOT necessarily a
good thing, either).
On 1/10/08, John Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In your experience, how much slower is fpassthru compared to serving
> > static content? Is it twice as slow?
>
> Well, I just tested it and it doesn't appear to make much difference.
> You have to fire up the php interpreter either way. I
> In your experience, how much slower is fpassthru compared to serving
> static content? Is it twice as slow?
Well, I just tested it and it doesn't appear to make much difference.
You have to fire up the php interpreter either way. I am running
PHP+APC, and I see 4.2 ms for both requests with th
On 1/10/08, John Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 1:49 PM, Michael B Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is the most efficient way to write large files to the client?
> >
> > fpassthru?
> >
> > Mike
>
> Yes. Make sure you are not output buffering, and don't forget to cal
On Jan 10, 2008 1:49 PM, Michael B Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the most efficient way to write large files to the client?
>
> fpassthru?
>
> Mike
Yes. Make sure you are not output buffering, and don't forget to call
session_write_close() before running fpassthru() if you are using
What is the most efficient way to write large files to the client?
I want to control download access to uploaded files (and dodge all the
security issues associated with allowing access to uploaded files) so
I can't just serve it as static content - it has to be under script
control.
fpassthru?
David Krings wrote:
Hi!
I got sucked into a (probably pointless) discussion about ASP vs. PHP.
One of the arguments against using PHP was that there is only a single
namespace. Uhm, that took the wind out of my sail as I have no clue what
a namespace is and why having only one is really bad.
In a few words, one namespace is a way to organize code into scopes.
By doing this, you prevent collisions when mixing libraries.
One example...
Packages Creole, Doctrine and PEAR_DB. All of them has one class named
Connection (Ok, I know they already differ in names, but this is just
one example
Hi!
I got sucked into a (probably pointless) discussion about ASP vs. PHP. One of
the arguments against using PHP was that there is only a single namespace.
Uhm, that took the wind out of my sail as I have no clue what a namespace is
and why having only one is really bad.
Anyone can explain
I would be interested in what others say as well as I am about to
implement a solution. What I am looking at is ARTIO JoomSEF.
Installed but not configured yet. Think I'll wait a bit to hear what
you all say.
Paul Guba
On Jan 10, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Randal Rust wrote:
These should be pre
These should be pretty easy questions for the Joomla experts. I have a
meeting with a potential client this afternoon who had the current
version of their site built by a turnkey service using Joomla. The
meeting is all about SEO and SEM, and I noticed two things right away
when I looked at their s
17 matches
Mail list logo
