Hello nyphptalk colleagues,
I have a client who has been upgraded to PHP5 and the ISP has also
implemented suPHP in the process. The core application that my client
is using had/has a write requirement on certain folders that do things
like temporary image creation and document generation/storage
his->setRecordStatusId($yourObj->getRecordStatusId());
$this->setRestrictedItemList($restrictedItems);
return true;
}
Once again, this is pseudo-code...
Christian
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.nyphp.org/pipermail/talk/at
ord_id) !== true) {
> return false;
> }
>
> if (!is_array($restrictedItems = $yourObj->getUnrestrictedItems()))
> {
> return false;
> }
>
> if ($yourObj->updateUnrestrictedItems(self::ObjectItemStatus) !==
> true) {
> return fa
his->setRecordStatusId($yourObj->getRecordStatusId());
$this->setRestrictedItemList($restrictedItems);
return true;
}
Once again, this is pseudo-code...
Christian
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.nyphp.org/pipermail/ta
On 1/11/08, Daniel Convissor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like returning as soon as possible. This clarifies exactly what's
> happening. Otherwise you need to read through the whole function. Plus
> it dramatically cuts down on the amount of nesting.
I think the nesting helps you understand t
On 1/11/08, Brian D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if (
> $yourObj->loadObjectByRecordId($record_id)
> && is_array($restrictedItems =
> $yourObj->getUnrestrictedItems()
> && $yourObj->updateUnrestrictedItems(self::ObjectItemStatus)
> )
I like returning as soon as possible. This clarifies exactly what's
happening. Otherwise you need to read through the whole function. Plus
it dramatically cuts down on the amount of nesting.
I also try to put the short code bits at the top so you can read it right
away and then move on to th
I actually would go with:
loadObjectByRecordId($record_id)
&& is_array($restrictedItems = $yourObj->getUnrestrictedItems()
&& $yourObj->updateUnrestrictedItems(self::ObjectItemStatus)
) {
$this->setRecordStatusId($yourObj->getRecordStatusId()
On 1/11/08, Tod Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I'm writing a function that returns a Boolean that indicates that the
> given process failed or Verse inline returns, such as "if
> ($condition !== true) return false;" that builds a list of failure by
> exception.
Hi Tod,
I don't think it
That's part of the reason I'm asking here, as the replies I've received
weren't that informative. I've heard that method #1 is a left-over practice
from C/Java programmers, and isn't necessary with PHP (??). I've also heard
the argument that returning inline values is faster, and easier to see
exac
Hello,
Word, I immediately feel version 2 is easier to understand. Yeah you
can't check the result, but you could step
through with a debugger and then check the *result*
$result just adds extra complexity; no need to copy the value and then
return it. Just return it at the first point you ca
Tod Dailey wrote:
The validity of one of my coding practices that I've used for awhile has
recently come under question. I've tried to listen to arguments on both
sides, and there seems to be good points on both ends, but my question
still hasn't been answered to my satisfaction.
I use versio
The validity of one of my coding practices that I've used for awhile has
recently come under question. I've tried to listen to arguments on both
sides, and there seems to be good points on both ends, but my question still
hasn't been answered to my satisfaction.
When I'm writing a function that re
Namespaces are supposed to be analogous to folders in the file system.
Folders are how we prevent file name collisions, and namespaces are
how we prevent function/classname collisions. If you have a bunch of
files that might have the same names as an existing file, then you
just create a new fold
Tony Furnivall wrote:
Certainly my fault - but the gripe about the extremely useless syntax
message stands!
I agree that those error messages are really worth improving. MySQL knows
exactly why it failed, it may not be able to determine the exact spot, but
missing quotes or a mistyped command a
UDDI is trying to do the same thing (with limited success, I've only
looked at their Web Services registration)... check out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Description_Discovery_and_Integration
Additionally, if you'd like to release software that won't have a
namespace conflict, purchase
Yitzchak suggested adding a quote to delimit a value - and it turns
out the solution was equally trivial.
I'm using a whole load of copied lines to build the query string, and
each one (one/field) had a comma at the end. I didn't notice it,
buried in the clutter, until I started adding a \n t
When Palm opened up the platform for 3rd party programming, they created
a registration page for the database type id's. This allowed for global
registration which would eliminate namespace collissions so long as
programmers registered the id's they were using prior to distro.
Don't know how
David Krings wrote:
Thank you for the great explanation. It triggers yet another question:
What to do if two namespaces are identical? Doesn't that end up to be
the same problem? And if one changes the namespace for one, doesn't
that require to change code referencing functions and classes f
Urb,
Perhaps you can comeback and gives us recap of what you find out and
what you have decide to go with and why.
:-)
On Jan 10, 2008 5:32 PM, Urb LeJeune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to all who responded to my request for suggestions on
> WYSIWYG editors.
>
> Urb
>
> Dr. Urban A. LeJeu
Did you copy that query directly? You're missing a quote to close value3.
Yitzchak Schaffer
Systems Librarian
Touro College Libraries
33 West 23rd Street
New York, NY 10010
Tel (212) 463-0400 x230
Fax (212) 627-3197
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tony Furnivall wrote:
Hi!
I'm having a problem with the UP
Hi!
I'm having a problem with the UPDATE syntax for MySQL
(aside - I hate products that tell me I have a syntax problem, but
don't tell me what it is - and then suggest that I go RTFM which is
equally uninformative:-()
I'm replacing the entire set of fields, WHERE a condition exists for
so
Kenneth Downs wrote:
Namespaces are an organizing mechanism, usually associated with classes.
Think: Class::functions as Namespaces::classes
So let's begin with functions. David Krings writes a nifty function
called "ValidateEmail()" and puts in a library. Then Ken Downs writes
the sa
Namespaces are an organizing mechanism, usually associated with classes.
Think: Class::functions as Namespaces::classes
So let's begin with functions. David Krings writes a nifty function
called "ValidateEmail()" and puts in a library. Then Ken Downs writes
the same function in a diffe
Well, first off as the local organizer for the NYC Joomla User Group,
I'd point you over to the Joomla mailling list also sponsored and
maintained by NYPHP(you can subscribe to it from their site).
As to your question, SEF in the Joomla world works in 1 of 2 ways:
1) The ugly way. Using nativ
25 matches
Mail list logo
