On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Brian Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been on many a list in my day and the Digest version always breaks a
> message thread.
Yeah, digests are bad, unless you are sure you will always be read
only. I wonder if some of the list indexing services like nabb
it would appear that your "problems" are arrising from the use of the Digest
volume.
I've been on many a list in my day and the Digest version always breaks a
message thread.
If you continue to use the digest, you would probably be best off to copy
the message that you are replying to into your e
I'm not used to working through lists. Just started. The other one I use they
have a reply-to on the individual message so the subject get's appended. How do
you guys get the "re" in the subject line?
Anyway, I'm responding to the forum spammer thread. These days, if you put some
energy into it
This promises to be very cool. A talk followed by a hands on lab.
And a virtual haunted house in Asterisk. This Thursday!
UNIGROUP OF NEW YORK - UNIX USERS GROUP - OCTOBER 2008 ANNOUNCEMENTS
=
sbeam wrote:
Akismet should be mentioned here, a popular spam detection ASP, free for
non-commercial use
http://akismet.com/
Another new entry is Mollum (www.mollum.com). It was created by the
lead developer of Drupal, Dries Buytaert. It bundles up concepts from
Akismet, Captcha, Razor and
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 13:11, csnyder wrote:
> Just looked at Bad Behavior, and it looks like an excellent tool to
> add to the kit.
>
hey. that looks interesting too. But it sounds
http://www.bad-behavior.ioerror.us/documentation/how-it-works/
like it is just looking at HTTP headers? if yo
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 12:39, csnyder wrote:
> I would design it so that everything went through a
> spam filter first, and the bigger the better. Like GMail if you can
> accept that from a privacy point of view, or your organization's
> internal spam filter. Then, and only then, would I allow
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:39 PM, csnyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In response to the fellow having problems with forum spammer, google "Bad
>> Behavior" and install it.
Just looked at Bad Behavior, and it looks like an excel
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In response to the fellow having problems with forum spammer, google "Bad
> Behavior" and install it.
>
> Other ideas.
>
> Create a question where people have answer for example "5+2". Or forego that
> because it's a pain and simp
Hello Brian,
Tuesday, October 14, 2008, 11:58:55 PM, you wrote:
>
if it has only started happening with the latest version i would check the vBulletin forums and see if there is a fix for the bug, or to even make sure they know about it.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:48 AM, <[EMAIL PROT
On Tuesday 14 October 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I only work on vBulletin and I always make sure I have the latest stuff
> installed. Earlier versions didn't have problem but since 3.7 seems like
> the badguys have found a way to just bypass the whole registration
> process. Like I said in t
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:48 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Brian,
>
> Thanks for the reply...
>
> I only work on vBulletin and I always make sure I have the latest stuff
> installed. Earlier versions didn't have problem but since 3.7 seems like the
> badguys have found a way to just bypa
In response to the fellow having problems with forum spammer, google "Bad
Behavior" and install it.
Other ideas.
Create a question where people have answer for example "5+2". Or forego that
because it's a pain and simply add a form field that you use css to hide from
humans and if that field
if it has only started happening with the latest version i would check the
vBulletin forums and see if there is a fix for the bug, or to even make sure
they know about it.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:48 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Brian,
>
>
> Thanks for the reply...
>
>
> I only wor
Hello Brian,
Thanks for the reply...
I only work on vBulletin and I always make sure I have the latest stuff installed. Earlier versions didn't have problem but since 3.7 seems like the badguys have found a way to just bypass the whole registration process. Like I said in the previous post wi
IMO registration forms should only use POST beacuse REQUEST is a
conglomerate of POST, GET, etc and is affected by the php.ini with the
variables_order and can be messed up and set insecurely by the host;
having said that, i do believe that cURL can do a POST. so it's not a 100%
solution to the p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello NYPHP,
I have an array that has 13000 email addresses. For now, its in the
script but will be in a database table eventually. It is a list of
known bad guys.
I have a database table with 9000 records and one of the fields is
...
Anyone have a better idea
2 more efficient ways:
1 - mysql solution - (You will have to look up the exact syntax) -
select table1.email from table1 where table1.email in (select
table2.email from table2) into table3. This will give you all the
matches in table3. Table1 should both probably be indexed on email, but
you ca
Hi,
Getting those 13000 into the db would be a good thing.
Then you could index the email cols in both tables, and
just do a join on the tables.
In the meantime, maybe try getting ALL of the email values
from the db into an associative array, (email => 1) and looping
over an "array_key_exists".
Hello NYPHP,
I am seeing that Registration forms are taking a huge beating from
scammers and spammers today, especially forum sites. I spend most
of my time lately collecting and filtering data to find the freaks
before they find the membership. Use to be and "every now and again"
but now its thou
Hello Elijah,
Tuesday, October 14, 2008, 2:47:14 PM, you wrote:
>
mikez,
I would suggest you break this down a bit, for instance instead of running
13000 sql queries, do a simple look up using IN.
For example:
'SELECT * FROM table WHERE email IN ("' . implode('","',$emailsArray) . '")
21 matches
Mail list logo
