> 4. Any links to really good APC howtos or tutorials would be greatly
> appreciated!
>
Not at all what you asked, but
If you're using absolute paths in your require/include files and you
turn this off you should see gains:
http://us.php.net/manual/en/apc.configuration.php#ini.apc.stat
In s
Hi Konstantin,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Konstantin Rozinov wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I recently installed APC (http://pecl.php.net/package/APC) to see how
> it works. Currently, I'm just using the opcode (file) caching and
> already the response time is about 4x faster. No code changes w
Hello all,
I bought the PHP certification pack (10 practice exams and an exam voucher).
So far I've taken two tests and done some studying. I've passed both, but I
don't know by how many points, or how well I would do on the real test. On
the section analysis I get 2-3 failures 2-3 excellents and t
Hi folks,
I recently installed APC (http://pecl.php.net/package/APC) to see how
it works. Currently, I'm just using the opcode (file) caching and
already the response time is about 4x faster. No code changes were
required and it was as easy as just enabling APC in php.ini. Now I'm
interested in
Paul A Houle wrote:
My understanding is that GUI clients for git are currently pretty
immature, particularly on Windows, which might be a problem for some.
I find that the GitExtensions for Windows already do the trick. But my
experience is bare bones and I am happy if I can check in and
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Paul A Houle wrote:
> My question is, am I missing a good PHP built-in for combining parts of
> URLs or filesystem paths? Is there a good library I should use?
You might want to look at routing components. For example, you can use
symfony's routing component by itself wit
I pretty frequently write code like
$url_base="http://somesite.com/system/controller";;
$path="object_type/verb.modifier/object_id";
$url="{$url_base}/{$path}";
note that this working correctly depends sensitively on how paths are
used, for instance, if somebody puts a slash at the end of $ur
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Greg Rundlett (freephile) wrote:
> Although I haven't used it yet, I would also point out that Mercurial
> (Hg) is the "other" distributed version control system (similar to
> git). It was just chosen by the Python project for their source. So,
> I would choose between git a
I too would recommend git (and github) for better collaboration and
merge support compared to svn. Most probably know this distinction,
but Git is a "distributed" VCS compared to svn which is a
"centralized" VCS. (People do still need subversion -- especially
where it's the common denominator. I
i've used vss before and it wasn't bad.? the one thing that was good and bad
about vss is that you couldn't check out a file that was checked out by someone
else, which makes things bad if you're on a project with someone else and they
forget to check something back in and said developer calls
yeah from time to time it goes down, not sure if their traffic doubled lately
or not.? gits been stirring up a lot lately ie this thread!!
~rob
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Convissor
To: NYPHP Talk
Sent: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 1:09 pm
Subject: Re: [nyphp-talk] Implementing Versi
Tom Melendez wrote:
I can strongly recommend UnFuddle:
http://unfuddle.com/
We use this at work as a bug tracking/project management system and
it's pretty good. I'm a tough customer for this sort of thing and can
find many complaints, but it's better than any of the other systems
I'v
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 01:03:53PM -0400, Chris Snyder wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Daniel Convissor
> wrote:
> >
> > Meaning, it's like SourceForge. :)
>
> Yes, if SourceForge had been created by anyone remotely familiar with
> either graphic design or social software. :-D
Though
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Daniel Convissor
wrote:
>
> Meaning, it's like SourceForge. :)
Yes, if SourceForge had been created by anyone remotely familiar with
either graphic design or social software. :-D
___
New York PHP User Group Community Ta
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:17:25PM -0400, y2...@aol.com wrote:
>
> well there's another point i'd like to bring up with github, there is a
> search within it so if your project is public, you can share and get
> project libraries to help you in your development.? so think of it as
> being a cod
no, i wasn't trying to criticize, i just wasn't following how your app was
configured.? it makes sense though. i've seen it done in both ways, it mostly
is determine how you want your application distributed.
~rob
-Original Message-
From: Chris Snyder
To: NYPHP Talk
Sent: Mon,
2009/3/30 Donald J. Organ IV :
> I am encountering the following error for an innoDB table.
> table 'xxx' is full
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/full-table.html but you've
probably already look there...
I haven't dealt with this with InnoDB tables, but I learned a long
time ago to include
2009/3/30 :
> i think you do bring up some interesting points, but i'm confused on the
> sensitive material part. do you not have this in your version control? i
> would assume you have a check to determine if you're developing locally,
> staging or production, so that you're not editing these f
well there's another point i'd like to bring up with github, there is a search
within it so if your project is public, you can share and get project libraries
to help you in your development.? so think of it as being a code
repository/sourceforge all in one.? also you can plug into git pretty
i think you do bring up some interesting points, but i'm confused on the
sensitive material part.? do you not have this in your version control?? i
would assume you have a check to determine if you're developing locally,
staging or production, so that you're not editing these files per server.
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, y2...@aol.com wrote:
> if you're a windows user who is also a developer, you should be
> developing on a mac - the best of both worlds and the future of
> development.
Well said :-)
The Ruby guys love github because Rails and a bunch of related projects
moved there...
2009/3/29 :
> yeah, i use git now and it's pretty awesome i must say.
>
> ~rob
The distributed nature of git makes it useful in a number of
situations where svn just isn't appropriate, such as tracking changes
to local configuration files. Since they only apply to the local
machine (and might con
i think that git/github is the best version control since sliced bread, not
that the 2 are related :)? git is awesome though.? for group collaboration you
can't do much better when it comes to merging, conflicts and omg branching!!
in terms of their gui, it's not quite as robust, but it gets t
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Tom Melendez wrote:
> I can strongly recommend UnFuddle:
>
> http://unfuddle.com/
>
> Both Git and SVN hosting (and the ability to switch between both).
> Bug tracking and wikis as well.
>
> One particular feature that I like is the ability to "commit against
> bugs". So,
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Randal Rust wrote:
> But my needs today are different. I need to provide access to people
> in various locations, different operating systems and need to be able
> to keep it all together and not create a huge mess.
>
> Any recommendations?
I use svnrepository.com ad Gitub.
>> I'd say look into a hosted version control service.
>>
I can strongly recommend UnFuddle:
http://unfuddle.com/
Both Git and SVN hosting (and the ability to switch between both).
Bug tracking and wikis as well.
One particular feature that I like is the ability to "commit against
bugs". So, s
I am encountering the following error for an innoDB table.
table 'xxx' is full
The table currently has about 21 million rows in it, and i think we area little
more than half way finished with the initial data load.
>From what I can tell I have to enable autoextend but I am not sure how to do
Rob Marscher wrote:
I'd say look into a hosted version control service.
My favorites for svn version control (which would let Windows users
use Tortoise, Mac users use Versions or command-line, and Linux users
use a number of different clients -- all can also use plugins within
Eclipse) are
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Rob Marscher
wrote:
> GitHub seems to be everyone's favorite for using git version control
I am on a local Ruby list as well, even though I don't use it, and all
of those folks seem to rave about GitHub. But I wanted to ask here, so
that I don't get a bunch of re
For SVN hosting, I wound up going with svnrepository.com. Fewer bells
and whistles, but cheaper. Good for a small shop if you know what yre
doing (sounds like you do).
Corey
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:27:56 -0400, "Rob Marscher"
said:
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 8:57 AM, Randal Rust wrote:
> > I need to
Svn hosting is a good idea, but if you have a unix box you can give
your subcontractors svn accounts and they can remotely access svn that way.
Another option is to setup visualsvn server on your machine.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Rob Marscher wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 8:57 AM, Randal R
On Mar 30, 2009, at 8:57 AM, Randal Rust wrote:
I need to provide access to people in various locations, different
operating systems and need to be able to keep it all together and
not create a huge mess.
Any recommendations?
I'd say look into a hosted version control service.
My favorites
As a small business owner, I am fairly able to manage projects with
just three server environments -- development, testing, production.
But the days of that working effectively are quickly coming to an end
as I increase the number of subcontractors.
I've used Tortoise in the past, but that was whe
33 matches
Mail list logo
