On 1/26/2012 12:22 PM, Tedd Sperling wrote:
On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Ajai Khattri wrote:
On 1/26/12 11:03 AM, Rukbat wrote:
As someone who started by writing machine code (not assembly, bits - and in
octal, which was the big thing back when we wrote code on stone with wooden
chisels), I
On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Ajai Khattri wrote:
> On 1/26/12 11:03 AM, Rukbat wrote:
>> As someone who started by writing machine code (not assembly, bits - and in
>> octal, which was the big thing back when we wrote code on stone with wooden
>> chisels), I can say that's very true.
>
> As so
Hi David, thanks for the excellent suggestions!
In all honesty, I think some people are viewing my goals as loftier than
they are. I don't plan on writing a book or designing a curriculum.
Instead, I want to go through one of my old "Learn to program Object
Oriented PHP" and rejuggle the les
On 1/26/12 11:03 AM, Rukbat wrote:
As someone who started by writing machine code (not assembly, bits -
and in octal, which was the big thing back when we wrote code on stone
with wooden chisels), I can say that's very true.
As someone who also cut his teeth writing code on 6502 and 68000
pro
As someone who started by writing machine code (not assembly, bits - and
in octal, which was the big thing back when we wrote code on stone with
wooden chisels), I can say that's very true. I've sen some C code that,
when it was compiled to assembly, was absolutely terrible. (And don't
get me
