Hans,
I'm starting to feel like some of these posts aren't being made in
seriousness... your thoughts.
On 6/22/2013 9:26 PM, Ajai Khattri wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:50:56PM -0400, Ken Robinson wrote:
>
>> How about OOP vs Procedural coding?
> This is like the earlier post asking about MV
In open-source world, there are hardly any compelling reasons to switch
from 1 technology to another. :-)
General rule of thumb is "Go with what you are best at."
Thanks,
Anirudhsinh Zala
On Jun 22, 2013 9:56 PM, "David Roth" wrote:
> I agree with Hans.
>
> I've never wanted to be one of those
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:50:56PM -0400, Ken Robinson wrote:
> How about OOP vs Procedural coding?
This is like the earlier post asking about MVC - some of us have moved on and
are looking
at functional programming.
--
Aj.
FaceBook: facebook.com/ajaikhattri
EnoLand: http://flip.it/c1ktG
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:27:15AM -0400, Hans Z wrote:
> Hmm, and how is this different from svn? Inherit in source/version control
> is the word "control" - why do I need X number of developers sporting their
> own pseudo-repository that ends having to get merged back centrally anyway?
To be f
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:50:27AM -0400, Daniel Convissor wrote:
> The ability to commit, branch, stash, et al, locally amazing. Plus the
> ability to have local hooks and the things you can do on the server with
> hooks is mind blowing. Here are two tools I use with Git:
You should give Mercu
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:38:34AM -0400, Hans Z wrote:
> Out of curiosity, are there examples? I compile PHP 5.4 regularly against
> recent releases of CentOS without issue - xml/gd/etc all work fine.
I think the fact that you said "compile" speaks volumes...
--
Aj.
FaceBook: facebook.com/aja
On Jun 22, 2013, at 5:44 PM, Nicholas Hart wrote:
> My .Net colleague and I were wondering if/when MVC programming is going to
> take over the world. Anyone using it yet in PHP and do you see it as the
> future path for all programming?
I would say MVC already took over the world for web app
Sorry for the double post, but tangentially related, someone write a View
Engine for ASP.NET MVC that uses smarty templates called Sharpy.
http://sharpy.codeplex.com/ I never tried it, but if you are heavily
invested in Smarty but want to try ASP.NET MVC its somethingg to keep in
minds.
Justin
O
Well, MVC was described by the Gang of Four in 1994 before the CLR was
written, and you could do MVC with Smarty templates since the .NET 1.1 days
(to lazy to google exact dates but I was using smarty before .NET 2.0 was
released).
That being said, I've never used any PHP frameworks besides Smarty
I just want to thank everyone who responded to my CentOS v Ubuntu
question. In case you're wondering, we did stay with CentOS which I feel
is the right choice at this time especially since we are migrating to VMs
on Xen server which is enough change already.
MVC:
My .Net colleague and I were wond
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Daniel Convissor <
dani...@analysisandsolutions.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks:
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:28:04PM -0400, Ronald Bradford wrote:
>
> > RH/CentOS is very behind in many LAMP products and the associated
> > dependencies via package management, while Ubunt
Agile vrs Waterfall project estimation and execution from an agency dev's
perspective.
Hans Kaspersetz
Arteric
Sent from my tricorder
On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:53 PM, "Mark van der Waarde | Alsjeblaft!"
wrote:
>> How about OOP vs Procedural coding?
>
> That would definitely be interesting.
Yes, it would be!
David Roth
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Mark van der Waarde | Alsjeblaft! <
ap...@alsjeblaft.nl> wrote:
> How about OOP vs Procedural coding?
>
>
> That would definitely be interesting.
>
> Mark
>
>
___
New York PHP User Group Co
How about OOP vs Procedural coding?
Ken
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Hans Z wrote:
>
>> I agree with Hans.
>
> :)
>
>> I've never wanted to be one of those people who over the years refused to
>> adapt to something new. But the reality is that it has to really be an
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Hans Z wrote:
> I'll happily seed the list: )
>
> Excellent list and I'd like to come to that meeting.
I'll add one thing to the git/svn talk. I began working on a legacy code
base that was stored in SVN without the trunk/branches/tags setup. I'm a
git guy, bu
>
> How about OOP vs Procedural coding?
That would definitely be interesting.
Mark
___
New York PHP User Group Community Talk Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
http://www.nyphp.org/show-participation
> I agree with Hans.
:)
I've never wanted to be one of those people who over the years refused to
> adapt to something new. But the reality is that it has to really be an
> improvement, not just new to justify the change.
>
And actually, this brings up a great topic for mailing list discussion,
I agree with Hans.
I've never wanted to be one of those people who over the years refused to
adapt to something new. But the reality is that it has to really be an
improvement, not just new to justify the change.
David Roth
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Hans Z wrote:
> Hey Dan,
>
> On Sat,
OT flame? Ok I jump in.
+1 for git... I mistakenly did a push -force deleting days of commits... I
called a colleague and asked to push back his latest commit, that saved the
day. Having multiple copy is like having lot of backups, so awesome. How could
you do that in SVN?
Git is the FTP kill
On Jun 22, 2013 10:17 AM, "Greg Rundlett (freephile)"
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Daniel Convissor <
dani...@analysisandsolutions.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Well, then. That's one more vote for Ubuntu/Debian in my book. :)
>>
>> Git (and distributed version control in general) is _so_ m
Hey Dan,
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Daniel Convissor <
dani...@analysisandsolutions.com> wrote:
> Hi Hans:
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 02:43:52PM -0400, Hans Z wrote:
> >
> > I'm always in favor of CentOS. Nothing particularly against
> Ubuntu/Debian,
> > but I just don't have any reason t
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Daniel Convissor <
dani...@analysisandsolutions.com> wrote:
>
> Well, then. That's one more vote for Ubuntu/Debian in my book. :)
>
> Git (and distributed version control in general) is _so_ much better
> than SVN. Using Git for the past 2.5 years has improved my
Hi Hans:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 02:43:52PM -0400, Hans Z wrote:
>
> I'm always in favor of CentOS. Nothing particularly against Ubuntu/Debian,
> but I just don't have any reason to switch to the newest trendy thing.
> Sort of like moving from svn to git :)
Well, then. That's one more vote fo
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Daniel Convissor <
dani...@analysisandsolutions.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks:
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:28:04PM -0400, Ronald Bradford wrote:
>
> > RH/CentOS is very behind in many LAMP products and the associated
> > dependencies via package management, while
Hi Folks:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:28:04PM -0400, Ronald Bradford wrote:
> RH/CentOS is very behind in many LAMP products and the associated
> dependencies via package management, while Ubuntu is much more up to date.
I was going to say the same thing. RPM's are YEARS (literally!) behind.
--
25 matches
Mail list logo
