>> I am testing my production site, and something seems to be
>> very wrong. I just loaded my homepage and it took 53.46
> Have a look at the site with the YSlow plugin for Firefox. It tests your
> site agains list of best practices from the performance guys at Yahoo:
> http://developer.yahoo.co
I have people working on it hopefully they¹ll figure it out.
On 10/22/07 5:21 PM, "Tim Lieberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like your server is sick. If downloading a single sub-1k image is
> taking seconds upon seconds, something is seriously wrong. Do you have full
> control of t
No remote access -- everything is coming from the server.
On 10/22/07 5:22 PM, "P. Ju (朱漢璇)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Cliff,
>
> Are you doing remote access of DB, images, or scripts? Recently DNS resolution
> with a freshly created site caused me 7-10 second access times to a
> remote da
Hi Cliff,
> I am testing my production site, and something seems to be
> very wrong. I just loaded my homepage and it took 53.46
> seconds. Clearly unacceptable for a production web site.
> And there should be zero load on the site, since no-one
> knows about it. One 775 byte image took 23 seco
Big-fat, honking dedicated, but was ready to switch to $3.95 shared.
KeepAlive was off -- turning it on appears to have solved the problem.
On 10/22/07 5:15 PM, "Brian D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cliff - are you on a shared host or a dedicated server?
>
>> On 10/22/07, Cliff Hirsch <[EMAI
Hi Cliff,
Are you doing remote access of DB, images, or scripts? Recently DNS resolution
with a freshly created site caused me 7-10 second access times to a
remote database.
PJ
> On 10/22/07, Cliff Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I am testing my production site, and something seems to
Sounds like your server is sick. If downloading a single sub-1k
image is taking seconds upon seconds, something is seriously wrong.
Do you have full control of the server, or is there someone at a
hosting company that can look at this? I wouldn't start worrying
about apache settings (whi
On 10/22/07 5:10 PM, "Cliff Hirsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am testing my production site, and something seems to be very wrong. I just
> loaded my homepage and it took 53.46 seconds. Clearly unacceptable for a
> production web site. And there should be zero load on the site, since no-one
>
Cliff - are you on a shared host or a dedicated server?
> On 10/22/07, Cliff Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I am testing my production site, and something seems to be very wrong. I
> > just loaded my homepage and it took 53.46 seconds. Clearly unacceptable for
> > a production web site
I am testing my production site, and something seems to be very wrong. I
just loaded my homepage and it took 53.46 seconds. Clearly unacceptable for
a production web site. And there should be zero load on the site, since
no-one knows about it. One 775 byte image took 23 seconds. A 51byte image
took
10 matches
Mail list logo
