On 1/26/2010 8:34 AM, Fernando Gabrieli wrote:
a question that i ask myself each time i find something that's not
working in IE is: how is it possible that a company like Microsoft can't
make a browser like Firefox? is it just a problem of the development
itself or is it something else? and if it
a question that i ask myself each time i find something that's not working
in IE is: how is it possible that a company like Microsoft can't make a
browser like Firefox? is it just a problem of the development itself or is
it something else? and if it's something else, what is that something else?
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Hans Zaunere wrote:
> Interesting you should mention that:
>
> http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=8755
The cat-n-mpuse game continues:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527446.000-to-beat-spam-turn-its-own-weapons-against-it.html?haasFormId=46aa9eea-8158-4b87-
At 8:20 PM -0500 1/23/10, Mutaz Musa wrote:
Far more depressing is the fact that IE users are 60+ % of the market.
Mutaz:
While Windozes holds the major share of the PC market, folks are
wising up to browsers.
I think the following is more in keeping with the "market":
http://www.w3schools
On 1/23/2010 8:20 PM, Mutaz Musa wrote:
Far more depressing is the fact that IE users are 60+ % of the market.
Even worse, the same amount of web developers code broken pages that only work
in IE.
The 60% IE varies drastically depending on where you go in the world. In
Europe IE has no longe
Far more depressing is the fact that IE users are 60+ % of the market.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Hans Zaunere wrote:
> > > > Very interesting -
> > > >
> > > > http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/22/internet-2009-in-numbers/
> > > >
> > > > What would be great is a decade analysis...
> > >
> > > Very interesting -
> > >
> > > http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/22/internet-2009-in-numbers/
> > >
> > > What would be great is a decade analysis...
> >
> > And the 80% spam rate is depressing.
>
> s/depressing/surprisingly low/
Interesting you should mention that:
http://www.net-security.o
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Hans Zaunere wrote:
> Very interesting -
>
> http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/22/internet-2009-in-numbers/
>
> What would be great is a decade analysis...
>
>
Interesting breakdown by pulling Google's customized server out of the
Apache mix.
It got me to thinki
s/depressing/surprisingly low/
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Ajai Khattri wrote:
>
> And the 80% spam rate is depressing.
>
>
> --
> Aj.
>
>
> ___
> New York PHP Users Group Community Talk Mailing List
> http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
And the 80% spam rate is depressing.
--
Aj.
___
New York PHP Users Group Community Talk Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
http://www.nyphp.org/Show-Participation
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Hans Zaunere wrote:
> Very interesting -
>
> http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/22/internet-2009-in-numbers/
>
> What would be great is a decade analysis...
>
30 Billion photos to Facebook in a year. That's going to be my new bar
for scalability.
__
Very interesting -
http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/22/internet-2009-in-numbers/
What would be great is a decade analysis...
H
___
New York PHP Users Group Community Talk Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
http://www.nyphp.or
12 matches
Mail list logo
