gt;
> anyone else experience this issue?
>
> http://wordpress.org/support/topic/136385
>
> ~rob
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Edward Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: NYPHP Talk
> Sent: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:25 am
> Subject: Re: [nyphp-talk] Open Source CMS f
:25 am
Subject: Re: [nyphp-talk] Open Source CMS for PHP5
Ummm, can some one tell me what I CAN'T do with Wordpress 2.6? Seems
to do ANYTHING you want as a CMS system, and now has wiki roll back
features, + 2000 plugins and extensions.
thanks, ed :-)
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
has anyone checked out expression engine. there is a base free
version and if you want modules, there's a small licensing fee; it
seems pretty cool though.
Just to clarify:
There is a free version that allows you to develop for/play with the
system, but not use it
Subject: Re: [nyphp-talk] Open Source CMS for PHP5
Edward Potter wrote:?
> Ummm, can some one tell me what I CAN'T do with Wordpress 2.6? ?
I was assuming he meant a strict Content Management System, ie save
content, set publishing dates, publish/unpublish it all under strict
PHP5
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:28 PM, bzcoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Edward Potter wrote:
>>
>> Ummm, can some one tell me what I CAN'T do with Wordpress 2.6?
Although I'm a big fan of Wordpress as well, there's no p5 strict
version of WP either.
>
> I was assuming he meant a strict Content Man
Edward Potter wrote:
Ummm, can some one tell me what I CAN'T do with Wordpress 2.6?
I was assuming he meant a strict Content Management System, ie save
content, set publishing dates, publish/unpublish it all under strict
PHP5 rules.
Not the rest of the framework that a decent CMS needs or
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Mark Armendariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I kinda dragged that rant out, didn't I.
No, it's good. It IS easy to write to strict mode, and usually not
hard to upgrade code written otherwise.
I think the main problem is foresight: you need to have strict
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:19 AM, csnyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Mark Armendariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've another project that came in disallowing me to take this project,
>> so I'll likely be moving on - but I'm still largely surprised by the
>>
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Mark Armendariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've another project that came in disallowing me to take this project,
> so I'll likely be moving on - but I'm still largely surprised by the
> results. If I had the time to keep a blog, this would likely be a
> very l
Ummm, can some one tell me what I CAN'T do with Wordpress 2.6? Seems
to do ANYTHING you want as a CMS system, and now has wiki roll back
features, + 2000 plugins and extensions.
thanks, ed :-)
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Mitch Pirtle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or you could just build y
Joey Derrico wrote:
Sorry to bring up what has been a dead topic for about a week but I was
going through old E-Mails and reread the thread and just had a thought.
If there is no CMS that supports all the features of PHP (which
basically seems to be the case) maybe we could work on one that ful
Sorry to bring up what has been a dead topic for about a week but I was
going through old E-Mails and reread the thread and just had a thought.
If there is no CMS that supports all the features of PHP (which
basically seems to be the case) maybe we could work on one that fully
supports ALL the
On Aug 14, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Mark Armendariz wrote:
digitalUs - The installation had p5 strict issues (un-initialized vars
throwing notices, which could be easily caught with __get methods -
also some method signature differences. once fixed (and @'d), ran
fairly well).
typo3 - only required
On Aug 14, 2008, at 12:42 , Ajai Khattri wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Mark Armendariz wrote:
I've been hoping to find a branch, at least, for strict p5 support.
It seems Cake 2.0 is headed in that direction.
I should also point out that symfony has always been pure PHP5 from
day
one (symf
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Mark Armendariz wrote:
> I've been hoping to find a branch, at least, for strict p5 support.
> It seems Cake 2.0 is headed in that direction.
I should also point out that symfony has always been pure PHP5 from day
one (symfony-project.com).
> If I had the time to keep a blo
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Mark Armendariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone recommend an open source CMS (or possibly commercial if
> worthwhile) that works natively on php5 (e_strict)and MySQL 5
> (strict).
Unfortunately most webhosts and end users are still reluctant to
commit fully
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:31 AM, bzcoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Armendariz wrote:
>>
>> Can anyone recommend an open source CMS (or possibly commercial if
>> worthwhile) that works natively on php5 (e_strict)and MySQL 5
>> (strict).
>
> I think you will run into problems as most popular
Mark Armendariz wrote:
Can anyone recommend an open source CMS (or possibly commercial if
worthwhile) that works natively on php5 (e_strict)and MySQL 5
(strict).
I think you will run into problems as most popular CMS creators, Open
Source or Commercial, are unwilling to tell the majority of t
Or you could just build your own specifically to suit your needs and
workflow using CakePHP :-)
-- Mitch
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Néstor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mark et all,
>
> I am trying to use drupal 5 and I am reading the documentation and tutorails
> and I still not able to
Hi Mark et all,
I am trying to use drupal 5 and I am reading the documentation and tutorails
and I still not able to create a static web page. They tell you htat
you have to download
this module and that module. I was able to find out how to create a static page
using postnuke.
Néstor :-)
On We
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Rob Marscher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's one that was built off of Zend Framework, so I'd guess that the odds
> of it running E_STRICT are pretty good:
> http://code.google.com/p/digitalus-site-manager/
>
> TYPO3 is another popular big cms written in php...
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Mark Armendariz wrote:
> I've just installed them all (not drupal) this morning and they all
> have problems with strict. A few minutes with google confirms this
> fact (including the link I provided to cake where the devs explicitly
> state that they don't plan on updating f
On Aug 13, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Mark Armendariz wrote:
Can anyone recommend an open source CMS (or possibly commercial if
worthwhile) that works natively on php5 (e_strict)and MySQL 5
(strict). I need it to install easily on Win32 and Linux. And the
ability to handle multiple domains with a single
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Ajai Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Mark Armendariz wrote:
>
>> Can anyone recommend an open source CMS (or possibly commercial if
>> worthwhile) that works natively on php5 (e_strict)and MySQL 5
>> (strict).
>
> Do you think that perhaps
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Mark Armendariz wrote:
> Can anyone recommend an open source CMS (or possibly commercial if
> worthwhile) that works natively on php5 (e_strict)and MySQL 5
> (strict).
Do you think that perhaps all of these CMSes might have some problems with
all the strict requirements?
Af
Lot of changes from 5.x branch: Views, Panels, DB abstratction layer,
Ahah (dynamically create drupal forms with _javascript_), Nodequeue...
and a whole other slew of modules. It has advanced from the 5.x
branch. Give it a chance.
-Anthony
justin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:26 PM, M
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Mark Armendariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried Drupal for a project last year and I'm just plain not a fan.
I'd give Drupal 6 a shot before discounting it entirely.
justin
--
http://justinhileman.com
___
New York
Can anyone recommend an open source CMS (or possibly commercial if
worthwhile) that works natively on php5 (e_strict)and MySQL 5
(strict). I need it to install easily on Win32 and Linux. And the
ability to handle multiple domains with a single installation would be
great as well.
This morning I'
28 matches
Mail list logo