Jerry B. Altzman wrote:
Until you can amortize away that period of negative productivity while
you're switching languages, it's almost always better to stick with
what you know, unless there's a really really compelling other reason
(like: what you want to do can be done in 10% of the time in
on 8/17/2009 10:34 AM Paul A Houle said the following:
Ajai Khattri wrote:
Why not Ruby?
Looking at post-PHP alternatives, I gave up on both Python and Ruby
pretty quickly. Although Python and Ruby are more advanced languages in
some ways, they're not "better enough" than PHP to be worth
Ajai Khattri wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Leam Hall wrote:
Of course, now part of me wonders if Python could cover where PHP
doesn't and we could keep Java contained in the Uni classroom. That
might help computer load levels a good bit...
Why not Ruby?
Looking at post-PHP alter
Ajai Khattri wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Leam Hall wrote:
Of course, now part of me wonders if Python could cover where PHP
doesn't and we could keep Java contained in the Uni classroom. That
might help computer load levels a good bit...
Why not Ruby?
Nothing I've read in Ruby made sense.
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Leam Hall wrote:
> Of course, now part of me wonders if Python could cover where PHP
> doesn't and we could keep Java contained in the Uni classroom. That
> might help computer load levels a good bit...
Why not Ruby?
--
Aj.
__
Thanks folks!
So there are some things like concurrency and XSLT 2.0 that Java
provides that makes it a contender in the system space. I'm not really
programmer enough to get that part but I'll accept your thoughts. :)
Of course, now part of me wonders if Python could cover where PHP
doesn'
