On 1/10/08, John Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In your experience, how much slower is fpassthru compared to serving
> > static content? Is it twice as slow?
>
> Well, I just tested it and it doesn't appear to make much difference.
> You have to fire up the php interpreter either way. I
> In your experience, how much slower is fpassthru compared to serving
> static content? Is it twice as slow?
Well, I just tested it and it doesn't appear to make much difference.
You have to fire up the php interpreter either way. I am running
PHP+APC, and I see 4.2 ms for both requests with th
On 1/10/08, John Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 1:49 PM, Michael B Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is the most efficient way to write large files to the client?
> >
> > fpassthru?
> >
> > Mike
>
> Yes. Make sure you are not output buffering, and don't forget to cal
On Jan 10, 2008 1:49 PM, Michael B Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the most efficient way to write large files to the client?
>
> fpassthru?
>
> Mike
Yes. Make sure you are not output buffering, and don't forget to call
session_write_close() before running fpassthru() if you are using
What is the most efficient way to write large files to the client?
I want to control download access to uploaded files (and dodge all the
security issues associated with allowing access to uploaded files) so
I can't just serve it as static content - it has to be under script
control.
fpassthru?
