Scott Mattocks wrote:
Allen Shaw wrote:
I agree it's a major feature, and I wonder why it's being deprecated,
as I find it incredibly useful (I primarily design targeted
applications, not public Web sites).
I think one of the main arguments against accesskeys is that they
interfere with norm
Allen Shaw wrote:
I agree it's a major feature, and I wonder why it's being deprecated, as I find
it incredibly useful (I primarily design targeted applications, not public Web
sites).
I think one of the main arguments against accesskeys is that they
interfere with normal hotkeys in the brows
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Peter Sawczynec
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 12:38 PM
To: 'NYPHP Talk'
Subject: RE: [nyphp-talk] html 5
Yes. That is correct. My bad. But, further generally to this area. Then
I was thinking that
Peter Sawczynec wrote:
Yes. That is correct. My bad. But, further generally to this area. Then
I was thinking that in a more convoluted way one might yet be able to
use JS with onkeypress event captures, so that JS could still remain
valuable here. So that certain keyboard combination events coul
: [nyphp-talk] html 5
Peter Sawczynec wrote:
> So are we saying that "id" and "name" will be used in favor of
> "accesskey". It was my impression that ultimately it
> was "id" that was supposed to win out as the way to address all the
> element
Peter Sawczynec wrote:
So are we saying that "id" and "name" will be used in favor of
"accesskey". It was my impression that ultimately it
was "id" that was supposed to win out as the way to address all the
elements in the DOM. Is that right?
Hi Peter,
I think the discussion for accesskey
that ultimately
it
was
"id" that was supposed to win out as the way to
address all the elements in the DOM. Is that right?
Peter
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Allen Shaw
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:49 AM
To: NYPHP
TED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Allen Shaw
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:49 AM
To: NYPHP Talk
Subject: Re: [nyphp-talk] html 5
Daniel Convissor wrote:
Hi Folks:
A new version of HTML is being proposed. Here are the changes
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-diff-2008012
Daniel Convissor wrote:
Hi Folks:
A new version of HTML is being proposed. Here are the changes
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-diff-20080122/. ...
One major thing I like is being removed: accesskey. This allows me (and
other users, I suppose) to keyboard navigate through web pages
Hi Folks:
A new version of HTML is being proposed. Here are the changes
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-diff-20080122/. Here are some
highlights.
* There are "section" elements and they can have "header" and "footer"
elements.
* There's a "nav" element.
* New "type"'s for "input" such as
10 matches
Mail list logo
