n List
<talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: Re: speech synthesizers
As do I.
There are many newer ones which say they are human sounding, they are
not, and in my opinion they are not as clear as easy to understand as the
venerable DecTalk I wish I could get it on my iPhone.
On Wednesday
List <talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: Re: speech synthesizers
I just found this fascinating documentary on Youtube. It's called Klat's
Last Tapes: a History of Speech Synthesis. It's amazing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=097K1uMIPyQ
David Goldfield,
Assistive Technology Spec
nt: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 4:15 AM
>> To: CJ MAY <chrisalis...@gmail.com>; Window-Eyes Discussion List
>> <talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
>> Subject: Re: speech synthesizers
>>
>> As do I.
>> There are many newer ones which say they are human s
st
> <talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
> Subject: Re: speech synthesizers
>
> As do I.
> There are many newer ones which say they are human sounding, they are not,
> and in my opinion they are not as clear as easy to understand as the
> venerable DecTalk I wish I could get it on my
ober 19, 2016 8:57 AM
> To: Kevin Barry <krba...@gmail.com>; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> <talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
> Subject: RE: speech synthesizers
>
> You can, sort of, its name is Fred.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Talk
> [mailto:talk-bounc
--
> From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+sclower=aisquared@lists.window-eyes.com]
> On Behalf Of Chris Grabowski via Talk
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:57 AM
> To: Kevin Barry <krba...@gmail.com>; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> <talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
> Subje
lis...@gmail.com>; Window-Eyes Discussion List
<talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: Re: speech synthesizers
As do I.
There are many newer ones which say they are human sounding, they are
not, and in my opinion they are not as clear as easy to understand as
the venerable DecTalk I wish I could
s Grabowski" <cgrabow...@aisquared.com>; "Window-Eyes Discussion
List" <talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 6:55 AM
Subject: Re: speech synthesizers
It seems to me that the more human sounding they try to make the
synthesized voice, the more computer like
--
> From: Larry Higgins via Talk
> To: Chris Grabowski ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 9:55 AM
> Subject: Re: speech synthesizers
>
>
> It seems to me that the more human sounding they try to make the
> synthesized voice, the more
To: Chris Grabowski ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: speech synthesizers
It seems to me that the more human sounding they try to make the
synthesized voice, the more computer like they end up sounding. I have,
thank God, known, or have
Barry via Talk
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 4:14 AM
To: CJ MAY ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: speech synthesizers
As do I.
There are many newer ones which say they are human sounding, they are not,
and in my opinion they are not as clear as easy to understand as the
venerable
:15 AM
To: CJ MAY <chrisalis...@gmail.com>; Window-Eyes Discussion List
<talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: Re: speech synthesizers
As do I.
There are many newer ones which say they are human sounding, they are not, and
in my opinion they are not as clear as easy to understand as t
Yes. Those voices are part of dec-talk. They just don't have the names
they used to. Pam.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Fairhurst via Talk
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 11:15 PM
To: Linette Sukup ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: speech synthesizers
If you run
To: Kevin Barry <krba...@gmail.com>; Window-Eyes Discussion List
<talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: RE: speech synthesizers
You can, sort of, its name is Fred.
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+cgrabowski=aisquared@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of
<talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: Re: speech synthesizers
As do I.
There are many newer ones which say they are human sounding, they are not, and
in my opinion they are not as clear as easy to understand as the venerable
DecTalk I wish I could get it on my iPhone.
On Wednesday, October
As do I.
There are many newer ones which say they are human sounding, they are not,
and in my opinion they are not as clear as easy to understand as the
venerable DecTalk
I wish I could get it on my iPhone.
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016, CJ MAY via Talk <
talk@lists.window-eyes.com> wrote:
> I
I originally used Dectalk Express and despite the wide choice of much more
human voices, I still prefer to use Dectalk Access 32.
Alison
___
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent
ay around with the
> tone option, you'll find similar voices.
>
> -Original Message- From: Linette Sukup via Talk
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 7:04 PM
> To: Reeva Webb ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: speech synthesizers
>
>
>
> The Kurzweil reading machine
If you run the DecTalk Access 32 synthesizer and play around with the tone
option, you'll find similar voices.
-Original Message-
From: Linette Sukup via Talk
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 7:04 PM
To: Reeva Webb ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: speech synthesizers
The Kurzweil reading machine has a child's voice called Kit the Kid.
Peace.
Linette
On 10/18/2016 4:02 PM, Reeva Webb via Talk wrote:
Ok, this is semi random but anyone remember a synth from the mid to late
'90s that had like child voices? They were somewhat real sounding. No, it
wasn't
Ok, this is semi random but anyone remember a synth from the mid to late
'90s that had like child voices? They were somewhat real sounding. No, it
wasn't vocalizer or dectalk or eloquence. I haven't heard them since but
remember them from elementary school at that time.
On Tuesday, October
21 matches
Mail list logo
