Re: [OSM-talk] Need help!

Frederik Ramm wrote: * : See http://www.openstreetmap.org/stats/data_stats.html > >>> Heh. Dmitry Oleynov is the most destructive mapper. For two days (8-9 >>> of Sept) he has removed 75139 nodes! But created only 888. >> >> His actions do not appear to be malicious though - in fact he ema

Re: [OSM-talk] Need help!

Hi, >>> * : See http://www.openstreetmap.org/stats/data_stats.html >> Heh. Dmitry Oleynov is the most destructive mapper. For two days (8-9 of >> Sept) he has removed 75139 nodes! But created only 888. > > His actions do not appear to be malicious though - in fact he emailed > Steve on Tuesda

Re: [OSM-talk] YOURS now supports route using only cycleroutes - Update

Gert, I see a message containing: 'just', 'should', 'would', 'just' and ending with 'then'... that made me chuckle ;) No, to be serious, Gosmore has it's own binary database that represents a special 'view' on the supplied OSM data. It's all fairly high abstract low level bit juggling to me. Al

Re: [OSM-talk] Large Hadron Collider at CERN now in OppenStreetMap

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote: > For now the two rings are tagged with highway=trunk and highway=primary > respectively. They also carry tunnel=true of course. There are a couple of > big notes tagged as well that confirm the highway tag is le

Re: [OSM-talk] YOURS now supports route using only cycleroutes - Update

Hi Lambertus, As I understand, YOURS routing is currently done on a database constructed from OSM. I do not know the structure of gosmore database, so I may be talking nonsense : I was questioning myself : What exactly is the problem in -on the fly- while constructing the router database- proje

Re: [OSM-talk] YOURS now supports route using only cycleroutes - Update

Ok, so you want a have-it-all-cycle-route-planner which I would like to have as well. But I don't see that happening with my current tools in a short term unfortunately. That's why I said in my announcement mail: 'now able to calculate routes using *only* cycle routes and networks'. This means

Re: [OSM-talk] YOURS now supports route using only cycleroutes - Update

Lambertus wrote: > Shaun McDonald wrote: >> This explains why I can't route from my house to work, where at each >> end there is no local cycle route, and there are several small bits >> in the middle where you cannot route over. This is either due to me >> not having bothered to split the way,

Re: [OSM-talk] Possible copyright data.

Yes, the person might have traced from yahoo. Do many of the streets have names? It's impossible to get street names from Yahoo imagery. Also open the area up in potlatch and see if the new roads match the yahoo imagery. Rory Charlie Echo wrote: > There must be a way to know the last person wh

Re: [OSM-talk] YOURS now supports route using only cycleroutes - Update

Shaun McDonald wrote: > This explains why I can't route from my house to work, where at each > end there is no local cycle route, and there are several small bits in > the middle where you cannot route over. This is either due to me not > having bothered to split the way, or as you say, there is

Re: [OSM-talk] YOURS now supports route using only cycleroutes - Update

Gosmore apparently has a rule that says you can't cycle over trunk ways unless you say (map) so. See: Cycle: Car:

Re: [OSM-talk] YOURS now supports route using only cycleroutes - Update

Shaun McDonald wrote: Lambertus wrote: Please note that the routing database is *only* filled with cycle routes that are mapped using *relations*. So there is no routing using cycle routes rendered on the Cycle map layer mapped with tags like 'ncn_ref' only... Unfortunately you can't see

Re: [OSM-talk] YOURS now supports route using only cycleroutes - Update

Lambertus wrote: > Please note that the routing database is *only* filled with cycle routes > that are mapped using *relations*. So there is no routing using cycle > routes rendered on the Cycle map layer mapped with tags like 'ncn_ref' > only... > > Unfortunately you can't see the difference on

Re: [OSM-talk] YOURS now supports route using only cycleroutes - Update

Please note that the routing database is *only* filled with cycle routes that are mapped using *relations*. So there is no routing using cycle routes rendered on the Cycle map layer mapped with tags like 'ncn_ref' only... Unfortunately you can't see the difference on the cycle map, but when th

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMXAPI question: is it me, or...

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Steven te Brinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Taking a closer look at the data, there are some strange things indeed. > However, these are not new, they are already in there several weeks. > I retrieve all routes in the netherlands: > relation[network=rcn][bbox=2.79

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMXAPI question: is it me, or...

The bbox of a regional cycle relation covers only a small area e.g. 10km square in most situations (50km tops) and checking that against the requested bbox would indeed give some routes outside the requested bbox but certainly not from a few 100 of km away. So I don't think the observed behavio

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMXAPI question: is it me, or...

Taking a closer look at the data, there are some strange things indeed. However, these are not new, they are already in there several weeks. I retrieve all routes in the netherlands: relation[network=rcn][bbox=2.7984557419334006,50.62642256377723,7.388298070963748,53.954129036190224] Problems: -

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMXAPI question: is it me, or...

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Lambertus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the quick action. The amount of data downloaded by the query was > significantly more then before so that was already promising. Looking at the > data in JOSM showed no sign of crippled roads so that bug appears to b

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMXAPI question: is it me, or...

The returned data looks quite the same as before the weekend, thus the bugfix has resolved the problem. Thanks, Steven 80n schreef: > I've found a bug and fixed it. Can you try again and let me know how it goes? > > 80n > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:23 PM, 80n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

[OSM-talk] Voting started on the vending machine proposal

Voting started on the vending machine proposal http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/vending_machine). Please do not hesitate to give you vote ! Thorsten ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/l

Re: [OSM-talk] Need help!

AkMeR wrote: >> This is worrying because this dispute involves two of the most prolific* >> mappers. >> >> * : See http://www.openstreetmap.org/stats/data_stats.html > Heh. Dmitry Oleynov is the most destructive mapper. For two days (8-9 of > Sept) he has removed 75139 nodes! But created only 888

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMXAPI question: is it me, or...

Thanks for the quick action. The amount of data downloaded by the query was significantly more then before so that was already promising. Looking at the data in JOSM showed no sign of crippled roads so that bug appears to be squashed. However the bbox parameter still does not seem to do what I