On 26 June 2010 07:12, David Murn wrote:
>
> Having just bought a new hard-drive, I found 400gb almost unavailable,
> most disks these days seem to start at 1tb and go up.
>
These are 'Server' SCSI (Serial Attached SCSI) disks. They are still available.
The highest available size is 600GB. We ar
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 06:47 +0100, Grant Slater wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> The upgrade is to expand the DB storage RAID-10 array from 10x SAS
> disks to 16x SAS disks.
> We will be adding a 4 bay external JBOD exclosure with 4x ST3450857SS
> (450GB, 15K, SAS).
Having just bought a new hard-drive, I
Hi Martin,
The upgrade is to expand the DB storage RAID-10 array from 10x SAS
disks to 16x SAS disks.
We will be adding a 4 bay external JBOD exclosure with 4x ST3450857SS
(450GB, 15K, SAS).
On the 15th June we attempted to background extend our array from 10x
disks to 12x disks. Storage Manager
On 17/06/2010, at 2:21 AM, Mike Collinson wrote:
> If you have been involved in bulk import of data from third-parties, may I
> ask you to check that this is on
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue .
>
> Why? Now we have final versions of everything, the License Working Group i
This is a good step forward, but please don't buy it that easily.
Famous map collectioner (no economic profit whatsoever!) just sentenced for 4
years in jail. No fun.
Right now we're in discussion another emerging investigation with a
paraplanerist who is 'remote sensing' with his Canon.
More go
hey for us tech/map junkies, can you give some info about what the upgrade
is about
from hardware to hardware
-Original Message-
From: Grant Slater
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 12:16 AM
To: Talk Openstreetmap ; annou...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Upcoming OSM Server Mainten
Mapping and cadastral information for Russia have not previously been
openly and freely available. These products were edited, censored
often and in many cases the work was simply not completed, thus the
framework for building a modern digital cadastre system did not exist.
Times change and the si
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Apollinaris Schoell
wrote:
> Maybe better to revert these whole changesets.
No can do - I don't have the programming skills to handle a revert,
and JOSM's changeset manager doesn't seem to be able to do it.
> This can be tricky if people have started to fix thing
OpenStreetMap,
Please translate and copy to local lists.
On the 2nd (Friday) and 3rd (Saturday) of July 2010 the sysadmin team
will be upgrading the database server's storage.
Editing will not be available during this period.
Initial plan, subject to revision:
1st July 21:00 (GMT) - API and we
On a node.
(need not to attach to the way of the trail)
"tourism=information;information=guide_post;name=Ye Olde Trail"
And for fun, i connect the node and way to a relation and describe the
trail route further
Cheers,
Sam
On 6/25/10, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Stan
most likely the way itself isn't always deleted. if a way is reduced to a one
node way it will be just a single dot on the map. nearly impossible to edit and
get the history without seeing a real way and where it should be.
Maybe better to revert these whole changesets. This can be tricky if peo
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Stan Berka wrote:
> I'd really like to be able to mark (and hopefully rendered) trailhead nodes.
> Is there any tag used (or may be rendered) for this? How about node with
> highway = trailhead?
I do see 31 highway=trailhead nodes in the OSMDoc database from last
Hi there,
Because of the mapping we are doing in the states affected by flooding in
northeastern Brazil, we had direct contact with INPE, and we were informed
that the satellite images of the CBERS 2B HRC can be used to perform mapping
in OpenStreetMap.
The images cover the whole South America in
I'd really like to be able to mark (and hopefully rendered) trailhead nodes.
Is there any tag used (or may be rendered) for this? How about node with
highway = trailhead?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
yes, that is planned in my upcoming gwtosm port.
http://wiki.github.com/h4ck3rm1k3/GWTOsm/
The Plan is to be able to edit locally, save your changes as an osm file,
host them on the server where the program is installed, publically or
privately, and share them with each other via git or bit torren
Hi,
lulu-...@gmx.de wrote:
As the topic of the map is discussed controversely,
vandalism is likely to happen, I am afraid.
If the user attempts to use OSM as a vehicle to further his own side in
whatever "controversy" you are alluding to, risking to bring lots of
vandals upon OSM, then that
Hi there,
there is a plan to publish a map where anybody can edit OSM.
The data is not forwarded to the OSM database directly but
written into .osm files for upload with JOSM.
The upload is planned to be done manually with a single user account.
I am worried that web users (or even commercial ma
On 25 June 2010 20:23, Chris Jones wrote:
> Any overhead is typically a percentage of the stored data for indexes
> and such, you cant just magically get rid of it!
I was under the impression that it was incremental data from minutely updates...
___
ta
On 24/06/10 19:44, John Smith wrote:
> On 25 June 2010 04:37, Richard Weait wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure I understand your question.
>>
> Over time, the overhead increases, not just the amount of data.
>
>> lose some large tables. But then you lose the ability to update
>> unless you do a
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.73928&lon=-79.88822&zoom=15&layers=B000FTF
All around here there are missing ways. I can't tell exactly what
happened, but edits such as
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3128411 and
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3125973 (done at abo
20 matches
Mail list logo
