On 12/30/10 5:09 PM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
My guess (without having run a query) is that the Biitig Road entries in the
database may not have any values tagged for town name and county name, and that
Nominatim is using the values from the nearest noses that have those tags
filled in.
[c
On 1 Jan 2011, at 17:07, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 12/30/10 5:09 PM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
>> My guess (without having run a query) is that the Biitig Road entries in the
>> database may not have any values tagged for town name and county name, and
>> that Nominatim is using the values fro
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 12/30/10 5:09 PM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
>>
>> My guess (without having run a query) is that the Biitig Road entries in
>> the database may not have any values tagged for town name and county name,
>> and that Nominatim is using the va
On 1/1/11 12:59 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 12/30/10 5:09 PM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
My guess (without having run a query) is that the Biitig Road entries in
the database may not have any values tagged for town name and county name,
and that
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 1/1/11 12:59 PM, Anthony wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Richard Welty
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/30/10 5:09 PM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
My guess (without having run a query) is that the Biitig Road entries in
On 1/1/11 1:43 PM, Anthony wrote:
It looks to me like the core database is correct. Biittig Road
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/5629489) is not in Averill
Park (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/175579).
ok, i didn't think i need to cover this.
the name Averill Park has
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 1/1/11 1:43 PM, Anthony wrote:
>>
>> It looks to me like the core database is correct. Biittig Road
>> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/5629489) is not in Averill
>> Park (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/175579).
>>
>
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Anthony wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
>> 3) there's a post office, which delivers to a Very Large Area, much
>> larger than the boundaries of the CDP. the actual postal addressing
>> is what people going to Nominatim are likely to be
i'm not getting a strong sense of an architecture for getting this
data into Nominatim in a useful way, just a bundle of opinions
about specific details.
it's not really leading anywhere, in part due to the fact that
noone from Nominatim has spoken up. i did just review the
Nominatim stuff i foun
On 01/01/11 23:06, Richard Welty wrote:
it's not really leading anywhere, in part due to the fact that
noone from Nominatim has spoken up. i did just review the
Nominatim stuff i found in the wiki. they want postal code
polygons in the database; in the US this is the extremely iffy
zip code boun
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> but i did find a workaround. i added
>
> is_in=Averill Park, NY, US
>
> to Biittig Road
Which is incorrect. Biittig Road is not in Averill Park.
Just like Linkwood Ave is not in Tampa, Florida. And Altair Drive is
not in Sewell, New Jersey
I agree. Don't forget it is the holiday and people take more time to reply.
What would be nice from Nominatim point of view is the creation of a page
where you would enter your test cases and what you expect. That would allow
the developer of nominatim to include those in his test suite.
It would m
> it's not really leading anywhere, in part due to the fact that
> noone from Nominatim has spoken up. i did just review the
Hi. Yes, I've been off doing new year type things. I'm playing
catchup on my email now - and I've still got a hangover so please
accept my apologies if anything is incoher
> I agree. Don't forget it is the holiday and people take more time to reply.
> What would be nice from Nominatim point of view is the creation of a page
> where you would enter your test cases and what you expect. That would allow
> the developer of nominatim to include those in his test suite.
>
On 1/1/11 7:54 PM, Brian Quinion wrote:
it's not really leading anywhere, in part due to the fact that
noone from Nominatim has spoken up. i did just review the
Hi. Yes, I've been off doing new year type things. I'm playing
catchup on my email now - and I've still got a hangover so please
acce
>>> what i still don't get is how it figures out the correct zip code of
>>> 12018
>>> for the displayed result string, i guess there's some research to be
>>> done yet.
>>
>> I've back ported some code from the new version a couple of weeks back
>> which tries to improve postcode handling for addr
On 1/1/11 2:32 PM, Anthony wrote:
Yes, and that's something that definitely does *not* belong in OSM.
If Nominatim wants to do this sort of lookup (and it probably should),
the shapefiles can be downloaded here
(http://www.census.gov/geo/ZCTA/zcta.html).
i opened up the local one and checked it
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 23:34 -0500, Anthony wrote:
> This only gives one of the possibly many acceptable city names for a
> zip code (e.g. for 12205 it gives ROESSLEVILLE). A zip can have more
> than one acceptable city name. See
> http://zip4.usps.com/zip4/citytown_zip.jsp
>
> For geocoding, yo
18 matches
Mail list logo
