Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM Fork] paths and roads and approval, oh my

2011-01-13 Thread John Smith
On 14 January 2011 07:28, Anthony wrote: > What is it you two are arguing about? NopMap is making the assertion that tags can't be altered once they start being used, but this isn't the case since abutters etc have already been deprecated in favour of other mapping methods/techniques. __

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM Fork] paths and roads and approval, oh my

2011-01-13 Thread Anthony
What is it you two are arguing about? On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM, NopMap wrote: > > > Hi! > > > JohnSmitty wrote: >> >> On 13 January 2011 19:17, NopMap wrote: >>> That's not a policy but an immutable fact. :-) >> >> It's either policy or just someone's opinion, can't be both... >> > > Reg

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM Fork] paths and roads and approval, oh my

2011-01-13 Thread NopMap
Hi! JohnSmitty wrote: > > On 13 January 2011 19:17, NopMap wrote: >> That's not a policy but an immutable fact. :-) > > It's either policy or just someone's opinion, can't be both... > Regardless of how democratically minded you are feeling, there are things in the universe that you cannot

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM Fork] paths and roads and approval, oh my

2011-01-13 Thread John Smith
On 13 January 2011 19:17, NopMap wrote: > That's not a policy but an immutable fact. :-) It's either policy or just someone's opinion, can't be both... ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM Fork] paths and roads and approval, oh my

2011-01-13 Thread NopMap
Hi! Elizabeth Dodd wrote: > > Even that would constitute part of a policy > That's not a policy but an immutable fact. :-) bye Nop -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/paths-and-roads-and-approval-oh-my-tp5913440p5917575.html Sent from the General