> Hi,
> I was just wondering is there a GPS track somewhere which actually marks
> the
> tropic of cancer. While downloading maps for oziexplorer, I have the
> option
> of overlaying a gpx track. With tropic of cancer track, my map would have
> a
> nice red line crossing it marking the tropic of c
Hi,
I was just wondering is there a GPS track somewhere which actually marks the
tropic of cancer. While downloading maps for oziexplorer, I have the option
of overlaying a gpx track. With tropic of cancer track, my map would have a
nice red line crossing it marking the tropic of cancer.
regards
Ta
On 18.01.2011 09:23, Chris Jones wrote:
BBC News Coverage of Map Kibera - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12164081
Also on German Tagesthemen:
http://www.tagesschau.de/multimedia/video/sendungsbeitrag91100_res-.html
Best regards,
Michael.
_
On Tuesday 18 January 2011 18:41:30 IT Intern wrote:
> Thank you Iván for the added advice!
You're welcome!
> So one thing you mentioned that Serge didn't is that once data is imported
> it should be maintained?
Let me use an example. Let's suppose you import the data from a province
goverment
Thanks again Serge! I think for the most part that cleared everything up
:). Only thing I'm still not so clear on is the tagging.
> Another question about this is that I
> am working in the U.S., but I would be importing data for a region in an
> another country. Do I follow the tagging system
Mike Collinson wrote:
>
> Yes the OSMF could produce a new set of Contributor Terms but No it could
> not force you or other existing contributor to accept them.
>
Isn't that exactly what the OSMF board has just done? I quote from the
12/12/2010 board minutes:
"The OSMF board mandates the LWG
On 17. 01. 11 18:53, yvecai wrote:
Sorry, I didn't advertise a lot about this, I should make a page on
the Wiki.
Here it is for the main map:
http://dev-yves.dyndns.org/legend/page.html
There's a link to a github repo with all the tools needed.
Yves
__
At 04:10 PM 18/01/2011, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
>With this new version, do you/others think it is OK for people who have
>previously submitted content on which they received a CC-By-SA + ODbL dual
>license (taking into account the future license change) to click the accept
>button? Cheers
Me,
Olaf,
Thanks, it looks like the clean text has been copied from a source other than
the diff-marked text. I've deleted it. We are meeting tonight and I'll stop it
going live until we double-checked the rest of the text too.
Regarding your main concern in
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermai
At 03:19 PM 18/01/2011, Anthony wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Mike Collinson wrote:
>> At 01:10 AM 17/01/2011, Anthony wrote:
>>>At what point, if any, does the database become one where OSMF can't
>>>switch back to CC-BY-SA without removing data?
>>
>> If 2/3 of active contributors vot
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:19 PM, IT Intern wrote:
> Thank you for your response Serge! This is a very good outline and you are
> very kind to have given me this kind of walk through. I have read through
> the docs about each part you outlined for me and have some more questions..
Great.
> "If
Hi Mike,
on December 5, you wrote an email to this list that the words "and any party
that receives Your Contents" in section 2 were only added because of a cock-up
and you promised to investigate. Now they are in the final text as well, but
not marked as such in the diff marked version.
The e
Thank you Iván for the added advice! So one thing you mentioned that Serge
didn't is that once data is imported it should be maintained? I am just
wondering because if one goes through extensive preparation to import the
data then why is it that it would need to be maintained? I understand if
th
Thank you for your response Serge! This is a very good outline and you are
very kind to have given me this kind of walk through. I have read through
the docs about each part you outlined for me and have some more questions..
"If you've signed up recently, you've accepted the new Contributor Term
On Tuesday 18 January 2011 17:16:42 Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> [...] generally the community doesn't like [imports], and usually it has to
> do with poor execution, and overlapping data.
That answer is spot-on. I do like imports, but only when it is certain that
there will be no overlapping data,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:42 AM, IT Intern wrote:
>
> This was originally posted here:
> http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=10817
Hi, and welcome to OSM!
There's a large split in the people who use the forums vs the lists. I'm biased.
The other resources for OSM are the Wiki (wiki
On 18 January 2011 15:48, Mike Collinson wrote:
> The links below show the wording we will formally release. I will confirm
> when it is done. We will then set up and announce mechanism whereby anyone
> who has accepted the 1.0 terms can upgrade, this will be entirely optional.
>
> The wording
This was originally posted here:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=10817
Hello OSM Community,
I apologize in advance if the answer to my question is blatant from the
docs, but as far as I can see there seems to be no way to contribute GIS
data to OSM. I am working on a project maki
Don't have the time to check right now but I think this was not permitted
with the license provided.
Greets,
Floris
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Claudius wrote:
> I just contacted the admin of http://sautter.com/map/ to add Bing as Base
> layer there. I think this would be your service.
>
>
The links below show the wording we will formally release. I will confirm when
it is done. We will then set up and announce mechanism whereby anyone who has
accepted the 1.0 terms can upgrade, this will be entirely optional.
The wording drops one suggested change - the addition of the phrase,
At 01:10 AM 17/01/2011, Anthony wrote:
>https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1sC0SrG_R6OkRDdC3IJKlmDEn2pYTY2DZfcpSLFdiBBU
Latest and greatest:
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1jY58fD3JyNUjzmecrpNejoOt4OnfHeEM-6o8rD5hCLY
>"You are indicating that, as far as You know, You have the rig
Right - it has taken longer than I expected, but I have an update. We
have "solved" the problem, which was, indeed, down to at least one
over-large polygon. Stripping out the sea polygons didn't fix things,
so we looked for the largest polygon and found a pasture-cover polygon
covering most of the
I just contacted the admin of http://sautter.com/map/ to add Bing as
Base layer there. I think this would be your service.
Claudius
Am 18.01.2011 11:53, valent.turko...@gmail.com:
Replace potlach with mapnik in previous email ;) Lapsus calami.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, valent.turko...
Replace potlach with mapnik in previous email ;) Lapsus calami.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi,
> are there any plans to add Bing satellite imagery as additional
> Potlach layer in view (not edit) mode?
>
> This could be nice for quick review and checking
Hi,
are there any plans to add Bing satellite imagery as additional
Potlach layer in view (not edit) mode?
This could be nice for quick review and checking if there are any
errors by switching between OSM and Bing layer.
Cheers,
Valent.
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
blog:
BBC News Coverage of Map Kibera - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12164081
--
Chris Jones, SUCS Admin
http://sucs.org
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
26 matches
Mail list logo
