On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 06:56:51AM +0100, Ed Loach wrote:
> Nathan wrote:
>
> > Would it make more sense to categorize by the tag? For example:
> > *FIXME:name=yes
> > *FIXME:maxspeed=verify that the entire road is 55 mph
>
> We don't need a proposal for this. It is such common sense that
> peopl
Nathan wrote:
> Would it make more sense to categorize by the tag? For example:
> *FIXME:name=yes
> *FIXME:maxspeed=verify that the entire road is 55 mph
We don't need a proposal for this. It is such common sense that
people do this already where it is appropriate (i.e. where more than
one FIXME
Would it make more sense to categorize by the tag? For example:
*FIXME:name=yes
*FIXME:maxspeed=verify that the entire road is 55 mph
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hi,
On 10/03/2011 12:49 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
OSM Inspector is very good. And hopefully Frederik will be along in a minute
to tell you how to use it from within Potlatch. :) Until then -
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/
As it happens I have just written this blog post to announce OSMI
P
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Jochen Topf wrote:
> Only manually detected problems should be tagged with fixme. And it should be
> as easy as possible to mark those. Extra categorization would make it more
> difficult.
I don't think it makes it significantly more difficult, as fixmes
should ha
Kev js1982 wrote:
> Whats the best way of finding these, the only one i have seen is the
> ito analysis but they dont offer zooming in :-(
OSM Inspector is very good. And hopefully Frederik will be along in a minute
to tell you how to use it from within Potlatch. :) Until then -
http://tools.geof
Commo fixme in the East midlands at least is
Fixme:stub for future suvey
Typically a path or bridleway where the end has been surveyed but the route
not traversed. often these hasn't been placed to accuratly either (i.e.
Someone spotted it when passing without gps) so incomplete isn't accurate
eit
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Ed Avis wrote:
> FIXME=Do these roads join here? Not clear on Bing imagery. Survey needed.
>
> That will be a useful note for somebody planning to visit the area later so
> they can check this place if they wish.
How about starting a convention of using a tag
Jochen Topf remote.org> writes:
>Problems with the data that are automatically detected should never ever be
>tagged on the data itself. This is useless, and worse, its counterproductive.
They should never be *automatically* tagged on the data itself.
>Only manually detected problems should be
9 matches
Mail list logo
