On 08/giu/2013, at 02:14, Andrew Errington wrote:
> Tagging is already defined for amenity=toilet (wheelchair=yes/no/limited),
> why
> not use that?
>
> wheelchair:toilets is not even documented, so why is it used more often?
different concepts, one is a feature, the other is an attribut
Maybe it is supported by a special wheelchair-editor?
In general I think the meanings of both tagings are different.
amenity=toilets => there is a single toilet
wheelchair:toilet=yes => there is another amenity, shop, whatever, which
offers a toilet.
Henning
Am 08.06.2013 02:14, schrieb And
That's the sort of thing that Overpass turbo does:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/
> -Original Message-
> From: Gervase Markham [mailto:gerv-gm...@gerv.net]
> Sent: 07 June 2013 16:52
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Parking map
>
> On 06/06/13 22:02, colliar wrote:
> > D
On 08.06.2013 12:24, Gregory Williams wrote:
> That's the sort of thing that Overpass turbo does:
>
> http://overpass-turbo.eu/
As well as the various special-interest maps based on the Overpass API:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Applications
__
Hi All,
The Call for Presentations for State of the Map 2013 closes Monday*. If
you've not yet submitted your presentation proposal please act quickly.
http://2013.stateofthemap.org/info/call-presentations/
I posted some ideas in recent SotM blog posts to get you thinking. These
were:
- What
I'm curious, but does anybody think that "notes" should be able to be re-opened
if necessary? Like if somebody falsely closes it when it shouldn't have been?
That or at least allow people to post follow up comments in case somebody needs
to add more info to if the person who closed/fixed it di
On 08.06.2013 22:22, James Mast wrote:
> I'm curious, but does anybody think that "notes" should be able to be
> re-opened if necessary?
Definitely yes.
I've created a ticket here:
https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4874
I was astonished there wasn't one since I heard a lot of complaining
ab
7 matches
Mail list logo
