Re: [OSM-talk] Overpass area query gives results outside area...

2013-11-08 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On 11/08/2013 04:58 PM, Fabian Schmidt wrote: > > Am 08.11.13 schrieb Jean-Marc Liotier: > >> To return multiple types of objects, this works: >> >> area[name="Senegal"]; >> ( >> node(area)[name="Fatick"];<; >> way(area)[name="Fatick"];<; >> rel(area)[name="Fatick"];<; >> area(area)[name="Fatic

Re: [OSM-talk] Overpass area query gives results outside area...

2013-11-08 Thread Fabian Schmidt
Am 08.11.13 schrieb Jean-Marc Liotier: To return multiple types of objects, this works: area[name="Senegal"]; ( node(area)[name="Fatick"];<; way(area)[name="Fatick"];<; rel(area)[name="Fatick"];<; area(area)[name="Fatick"];<; ); out; I would expect the area() to be a subset of way() and

Re: [OSM-talk] Overpass area query gives results outside area...

2013-11-08 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On 11/08/2013 04:16 PM, Fabian Schmidt wrote: > area[name="Senegal"]; > node(area)[name="Dakar"]; > out; > > returns a place=city, place=state and a container harbour, but not > Dakar in San Sebastián. Yes, my syntax was incorrect. To return multiple types of objects, this works: area[name

Re: [OSM-talk] Overpass area query gives results outside area...

2013-11-08 Thread Fabian Schmidt
Am 06.11.13 schrieb Jean-Marc Liotier: I need to extract objects that fall within the bounds of Senegal - so I turned to the Overpass API... But it seems that my level of understanding does not yet match its power. I need your help ! As an exercise, let's find Dakar in Senegal - http://overp

Re: [OSM-talk] Es weihnachtet wieder sehr ....

2013-11-08 Thread Pieren
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Andreas Labres wrote: > Christmas trees are not an "event". If you like. Call it "temporary feature", like tents in camping, exhibitions, motor shows, food trucks, etc > I regret you delete features without having verified if they are current or > not. Good poi

Re: [OSM-talk] Es weihnachtet wieder sehr ....

2013-11-08 Thread Andreas Labres
On 08.11.13 12:17, Pieren wrote: > Please, don't tag events in OSM. Christmas trees are not an "event". They are built up on mostly the same spot every year (at least here in Vienna) and it of course makes sense to map them. I regret you delete features without having verified if they are current

Re: [OSM-talk] Es weihnachtet wieder sehr ....

2013-11-08 Thread Pieren
2013/11/8 Jan Tappenbeck : > Hoho ! > > in den letzten Tagen habe ich schon einige Anfragen bekommen - jetzt ist es > wieder soweit die OSM XMAS-Karte [1] wird wieder aktuallisiert und es können > die Daten wieder fleißig nachgeführt werden. Please, don't tag events in OSM. We don't delete roads w

[OSM-talk] Es weihnachtet wieder sehr ....

2013-11-08 Thread Jan Tappenbeck
Hoho ! in den letzten Tagen habe ich schon einige Anfragen bekommen - jetzt ist es wieder soweit die OSM XMAS-Karte [1] wird wieder aktuallisiert und es können die Daten wieder fleißig nachgeführt werden. Für die Neueinsteiger finden sich die Tag-Beschreibungen unter [2]. Ich möchte auch noc