On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Philip Barnes wrote:
> Forgetting the tagging for a moment, is it not irresponsible to be
> mapping and thus being seen as encouraging such activities?
>
> Every year when there is hot weather there are warnings not to swim in
> lakes and rivers, and these are ine
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> How best should I tag informal swimming areas? These typically have no
> lifeguard or facilities. An example deep-content site for these types of
> holes is:
> http://www.iforgotthename.com/
>
> In OSM is it best to create an area and tag
>
On the contrary, where there's water you can technically swim.
I'm not against mapping informal places, but they should be well known for such
activities.
On 25 avril 2014 15:07:15 UTC+02:00, Philip Barnes wrote:
>On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 23:03 -0700, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>> How best should I tag
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 23:03 -0700, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> How best should I tag informal swimming areas? These typically have
> no lifeguard or facilities. An example deep-content site for these
> types of holes is:
> http://www.iforgotthename.com/
>
>
> In OSM is it best to create an area and t
I think the "club house" is more relevant than the "headquarters".
"Headquarters" usually implies administrative offices, which may be in a
different location. Most visitors (pilots, passengers etc in this case)
will not want the offices, but the main building where the club
activities take plac
On 25/04/2014 00:02, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
You're really talking here about the club /headquarters/... the place
where visitor interactions take place. The club may also have other
facilities (berths, hangers) that are mappable, but not where you'd
direct a first time visitor.
Yes but, as you
6 matches
Mail list logo