Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Code of Conduct

2014-06-02 Thread Clifford Snow
OpenStreetMap Code of Conduct === I'd like to keep this effort going. Who out there is interested in helping taking the draft CoC through to acceptance? Clifford > -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch __

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Code of Conduct

2014-06-02 Thread Clifford Snow
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > I think we should extend this a bit, and instead of having a "Code of > Conduct" we shold have a document that says "How to be a good mapper". > This would include the standard elements of a code of conduct - e.g. > about courtesy, respect, a

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Code of Conduct

2014-06-02 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 06/02/2014 04:38 PM, Kathleen Danielson wrote: > Would you object to us pursuing these goals separately? Not at all - it's just that I believe that if you e.g. want to find examples of "resepctful" or "unrespectful" behaviour in OSM you will probably find an example that involves editing

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Code of Conduct

2014-06-02 Thread Kathleen Danielson
Hi Frederik, I think that we can do both, albeit separately. I agree that our CoC can be similar to other organization's, but I want to be sure that our CoC doesn't get diluted or overlooked in the process, so I definitely don't think they should be the same thing. As strange as it sounds, even

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Code of Conduct (was 'Data Working Group (DWG) and Imports')

2014-06-02 Thread Kathleen Danielson
(Needless to say, others who have thoughts on this should feel free to chime in-- no need to wait for me, of course!) On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Kathleen Danielson < kathleen.daniel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Simply starting a new thread here to discuss implementing a Code of > Conduct in our c

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Code of Conduct

2014-06-02 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 06/02/2014 07:38 AM, Kathleen Danielson wrote: > Simply starting a new thread here to discuss implementing a Code of > Conduct in our community I think we should extend this a bit, and instead of having a "Code of Conduct" we shold have a document that says "How to be a good mapper". This