Re: [OSM-talk] "guide to vandalism” in OSM?

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote: > On 12 February 2015 at 13:55, Marc Gemis wrote: > > > The comments were saying that vandalism is rare on OSM > Wikipedia sensibly offers this advice: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Don%27t_stuff_beans_up_your_nose Yet: http://

Re: [OSM-talk] Usage without attribution: US Geological Survey

I sent a message to a USGS employee in Tacoma that has helped me in the past. I'm hoping he can direct me to the right individual. Clifford On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Hans De Kryger wrote: > > > *Regards,* > > *Hans* > > > *http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13 >

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

> OSRM and other routers won't use the highway you want it to use because > its > under construction in the OSM data ( > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27593150#map=13/50.4550/-113.8127&layers=Q). Ahh, that would probably do it. I have removed 'construction=trunk' and 'motor_vehicle=no' tags as

Re: [OSM-talk] Big Lakes

On Tuesday 17 February 2015, malenki wrote: > > > >1 ways each with 2000 nodes would be 20 million nodes. Evenly > >distributed on 14000 km outline means a node distance of 70cm - your > >average node distance seems to be more in the range of 10-20m - i > >suppose something is wrong here, for

Re: [OSM-talk] Usage without attribution: US Geological Survey

*Regards,* *Hans* *http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13 * On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: > Paul, > When I get home later today I'll email a USGS employee I know. He can > probably suggest who I can contact. >

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

OSRM and other routers won't use the highway you want it to use because its under construction in the OSM data ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27593150#map=13/50.4550/-113.8127&layers=Q). Most often it's not router but a data problem. 2015-02-17 22:32 GMT+01:00 : > > +1 this is awesome > > Ye

Re: [OSM-talk] Big Lakes

malenki wrote: >For curiosity I had a look at the first version of Lake Nasser – the >shore was 1733 km long. PS: if you want to have a look, too: http://malenki.ch/OSM/data/first_lake_nasser_complete_v1.osm ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.o

Re: [OSM-talk] Big Lakes

Christoph Hormann wrote: >On Tuesday 17 February 2015, malenki wrote: >> Based on what I have done so far I'd expect an Multipolygon (MP) with >> about 10.000 Members and an outline of 14.000 km length. A relation >> of this size is no good idea in hindsight of maintainability and >> conflicts due

Re: [OSM-talk] Usage without attribution: US Geological Survey

Paul, When I get home later today I'll email a USGS employee I know. He can probably suggest who I can contact. Clifford On Feb 17, 2015 1:32 PM, "Paul Johnson" wrote: > On the streets layer? I don't doubt the other layers are lacking proper > attribution as well. But OSM is ours. > > On Tue,

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

> +1 this is awesome Yes, but It would be nice if there were someway to report/analyse incorrect routes. For example driving from Crowsnest Pass to Calgary suggests a valid (but longer) route than anyboby/everybody would actually take. If I jump across to 'project-osm' to give it a suggestio

Re: [OSM-talk] Usage without attribution: US Geological Survey

On the streets layer? I don't doubt the other layers are lacking proper attribution as well. But OSM is ours. On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Hans De Kryger wrote: > It looks to me that there using here maps. Around my area it's pretty much > dead on with what here maps is shows. > > *Regards

Re: [OSM-talk] Usage without attribution: US Geological Survey

It looks to me that there using here maps. Around my area it's pretty much dead on with what here maps is shows. *Regards,* *Hans* *http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13 * On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On W

Re: [OSM-talk] Big Lakes

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:45:31PM +0100, malenki wrote: > I am working on Lake Nasser* and can predict that after enhancing > it's shore the resulting MP will be quite big. > Based on what I have done so far I'd expect an Multipolygon (MP) with > about 10.000 Members and an outline of 14.000 km l

Re: [OSM-talk] Big Lakes

On Tuesday 17 February 2015, malenki wrote: > I am working on Lake Nasser* and can predict that after enhancing > it's shore the resulting MP will be quite big. > Based on what I have done so far I'd expect an Multipolygon (MP) with > about 10.000 Members and an outline of 14.000 km length. A relat

[OSM-talk] Big Lakes

I am working on Lake Nasser* and can predict that after enhancing it's shore the resulting MP will be quite big. Based on what I have done so far I'd expect an Multipolygon (MP) with about 10.000 Members and an outline of 14.000 km length. A relation of this size is no good idea in hindsight of ma

Re: [OSM-talk] Usage without attribution: US Geological Survey

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Paul Johnson > wrote: > >> Found it here while checking out a nearby earthquake I was notified >> about... >> http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usb000tiqz#general_map >> >> The "Street" lay

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Nice! 2015-02-17 16:30 GMT+01:00 Paweł Paprota : > Great work! > > Picked up by Slashdot BTW: > http://tech.slashdot.org/story/15/02/17/1351206/openstreetmaporg-gets-routing > :-) > > Paweł > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015, at 15:22, Steve Coast wrote: >> +1 this is awesome >> >> Steve >> >> On Feb 16,

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Great work! Picked up by Slashdot BTW: http://tech.slashdot.org/story/15/02/17/1351206/openstreetmaporg-gets-routing :-) Paweł On Tue, Feb 17, 2015, at 15:22, Steve Coast wrote: > +1 this is awesome > > Steve > > On Feb 16, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Michael Kugelmann wrote: > >> Am 16.02.2015 um 20

[OSM-talk] Fire hydrants in Oxfordshire

Data has been released here: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/location_of_fire_hydrants It's probably OS-derived, but may still be a useful aid to anyone wanting to conduct their own survey; and the diameter values may be OK. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

+1 this is awesome Steve > On Feb 16, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Michael Kugelmann wrote: > >> Am 16.02.2015 um 20:20 schrieb Rob Nickerson: >> Congratulations to all those who were involved in getting directions/routing >> on openstreetmap.org :-) > +1! > > > Cheers, > Michael. > > ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

On 16.02.15 20:20, Rob Nickerson wrote: > Congratulations to all those who were involved in getting directions/routing > on openstreetmap.org :-) +1 Is there a *Route To Here* option? In the form that: -> I give the destination (coordinates plus name) as GET parameters

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

On Tue Feb 17 10:15:26 2015 GMT, StephaneP wrote: > Thanks for this useful feature ! > > I have one request : > A reverse start/destination button. > Is there a way to add a via, in osrm it is drag the route, but can't do it here. Phil (trigpoint ) -- Sent from my Jolla ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

This is the perfect news . I aslo made a short video that i am promoting in the local community for people to see just how easy is to route. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehHVZvFnVVs&feature=youtu.be I hope this will make people, and also bussines to add more POI , because now they can see the

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Thanks for this useful feature ! I have one request : A reverse start/destination button. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Routing-on-osm-org-tp5833738p5833852.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.