sent from a phone
> Am 19.08.2015 um 20:06 schrieb Glenn Powers :
>
> For the record, I deleted an abandoned railway that leads through a new
> housing development, because it didn't make any sense to leave it there.
>
> Satellite images clearly show ground gradings indicating an abandoned
> r
moltonel writes:
> The existence of ohm is a strong aknowlegement that osm is only for
> the present. Russ, you're an expert in old railroads, but think of
> all the other old things you could be an expert of. If all the
> niche experts
When they show up, we can have a discussion. In the meant
Frederik Ramm writes:
> Also I have the impression that, contrary to what you're saying, at
> least some proponents of abandoned railway mapping find it totally ok to
> map an abandoned railway that "leads through" a modern day housing
> development.
"Abandoned"? No. Dismantled? Yes. Now, I mu
moltonel 3x Combo writes:
> I do empathise with Russ being angered at his work being deleted
> without discussion.
Not any happier if it gets deleted after discussion either. I brought
my data (I started mapping railways in 2004) to OSM because I thought
that the community was friendly to abando
moltonel 3x Combo writes:
> To me the distinguishing criteria between disused and abandoned is
> wether the rails are still present or not.
Indeed. disused means the rails are still there. Abandoned means that
the rails are gone. Dismantled (or some people use razed) is when a
section of the rai
moltonel 3x Combo writes:
> The demolished: prefix only makes sense when there is something left
> of the former feature, typically rubble (useful for example to alert
> boattripers of the hazard). When there is nothing left in reality,
> there should be nothing left in OSM.
Question: should w
Glenn Powers writes:
> For the record, I deleted an abandoned railway that leads through a new
> housing development, because it didn't make any sense to leave it there.
>
> Satellite images clearly show ground gradings indicating an abandoned
> railway. IIRC, it was also featured in century-
For those that did not check on Mateusz Konieczny diary entries[1],
postings to this mailing list and github discussions then the Proposed
Great Colour Shift might come as a surprise if it is implemented.
According to the github discussion there is an "overwhelming consensus"
[2] on moving fro
On 08/16/2015 03:11 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Also I have the impression that, contrary to what you're saying, at
> least some proponents of abandoned railway mapping find it totally ok to
> map an abandoned railway that "leads through" a modern day housing
> development.
For the record, I delet
On 19/08/15 01:36, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
> Be carefull not to mix up database history and real-world history.
> Database history keeps track of the mapping process, as geometry gets
> refined, details get added, and blunders get reverted. World history
> tracks what the world was like at a speci
10 matches
Mail list logo