-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AFAIK this is the standard mailman configuration and not different
from other lists. the reply-to you mention is mot in every mail from
this list, but only in those which are from this person. that's expected.
You should respect netiquette and make a
I'm talking basically about the UK here but I know of similar examples
in the States and Australia and I assume the same rules can be applied
world wide.
There are a large number of structures currently mapped that require
prior knowledge to establish their existence and previous usage.
Railways,
On 24/08/15 08:12, Max wrote:
> You should respect netiquette and make a new thread when starting a
> new topic. Don't just hit reply on a random email from the list and
> change subject.
If quoting of messages was better managed it would be easier to follow
things. The p.s. was part of the origin
On 24/08/2015, Balaco Baco wrote:
> buildings are usually
> replaced much faster than maps are expected to last, and the work of
> updating it twice, once for the "empty space, dem. building" and the
> future "new building outline" is better done only one time.
It's nice to avoid unecessary versi
On 24/08/2015 7:25 PM, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
On 24/08/2015, Balaco Baco wrote:
buildings are usually
replaced much faster than maps are expected to last, and the work of
updating it twice, once for the "empty space, dem. building" and the
future "new building outline" is better done only one
moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
> Remember that interpreting osm data is actually a lot of work.
> Very few people have the manpower to verify what railroad=
> dismantled actually mean to decide wheter they want to use
> or filter out that data. Most of them will just match railway=*,
> plus perhaps so
On 24/08/2015 04:23, Balaco Baco wrote:
Are you saying if a building gets demolished & replaced with a new one,
you wouldn't remove the original outline from OSM?
I'm saying that simply deleting the original outline, leaving nothing in
its place is different than putting the *same quality outlin
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Max wrote:
>
> AFAIK this is the standard mailman configuration and not different
> from other lists. the reply-to you mention is mot in every mail from
> this list, but only in those which are from this person. that's expected.
>
> You should respect netiquette an
8 matches
Mail list logo
