+1
this is not the role of the style to re-interpret the classification and get
rid of important elements of the classification. I did mention this before the
style was completed but badly it was decided to ignore objections on this.
Let's not play on words to explain why.
Pierre
De :
On 04/11/15 12:08, Pieren wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> > tertiaries are still rendered, they just don't have a different colour
>> > than other roads (but they are thicker). In German we say: remain on the
>> > carpet ;-)
> Well, I would say in English
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> tertiaries are still rendered, they just don't have a different colour than
> other roads (but they are thicker). In German we say: remain on the carpet ;-)
Well, I would say in English "you play with words". It's not visible
as a spec
Am 04.11.2015 um 06:06 schrieb Max:
> Could the renderer take the number of lanes and/or with information of
> the road into account? Then we would not have this issue.
>
The rendering database currently does not include the lanes value, or
put differently any such feature would have to weight f
On 04/11/15 01:06, Dave F. wrote:
>
> Hmm... Interesting; I notice nearby that motorway & links are now
> rendered as I suggested:
>
> http://bl.ocks.org/tyrasd/raw/6164696/#18.00/1.29498/103.87800
>
> However it doesn't for trunk_link:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.39961/-2.33758
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
