> On Jan 9, 2016, at 4:07 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> In this case, though, Microsoft was actually directly copying Google's search
> results, and directly admitted to it.
> http://searchengineland.com/google-bing-is-cheating-copying-our-search-results-62914
>
> That situation is actually closer
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Simon Poole wrote:
> > But the idea that facts indexed by Google could be tainted is a
> > stretch. It's not something they've tried to claim, it would be a
> > tenuous legal argument, and it doesn't make much sense. I think this
> > is a case where practical judg
2 matches
Mail list logo
