Re: [OSM-talk] Applicability of wiki tagging and votes: may, should or must

2016-01-29 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 21:09:42 + Chris Hill wrote: > This diversity of tagging is often quoted as a problem for data > consumers. Oddly, this is often by people who don't actually use the > data but feel it must be awkward. Actually it's not. All OSM data has > to processed before use. This p

Re: [OSM-talk] Applicability of wiki tagging and votes: may, should or must

2016-01-29 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On 29 January 2016 at 17:37, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > "but that's not much to do with tagging diversity" - I would dispute > it, from my personal experience. Tagging diversity IS one of real > problems in using OSM data. +1. -- Matthijs ___ talk mai

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenRandomMap

2016-01-29 Thread Nick Whitelegg
That is a lot of words in wordlist.txt! Most amusing so far "OpenTrueToadMap" Also got "OpenBarMap" and "OpenCentralParkMap" which sould real. Nick From: Tim Waters Sent: 28 January 2016 16:01 To: Russ Nelson Cc: OSM Talk List Subject: Re: [OSM-talk]

Re: [OSM-talk] Applicability of wiki tagging and votes: may, should or must

2016-01-29 Thread Roland Olbricht
>> This diversity of tagging is often quoted as a problem for data >> consumers. Oddly, this is often by people who don't actually use the >> data but feel it must be awkward. Actually it's not. All OSM data has >> to processed before use. This processing can be fairly >> straightforward or really

Re: [OSM-talk] Applicability of wiki tagging and votes: may, should or must

2016-01-29 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:38:46 +0100 Roland Olbricht wrote: > >> This diversity of tagging is often quoted as a problem for data > >> consumers. Oddly, this is often by people who don't actually use > >> the data but feel it must be awkward. Actually it's not. All OSM > >> data has to processed

Re: [OSM-talk] Applicability of wiki tagging and votes: may, should or must

2016-01-29 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 20:31:04 +0100 Matthijs Melissen wrote: > On 28 January 2016 at 20:16, David Marchal wrote: > > On a GitHub issue > > (https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2027#issuecomment-174443685), > > I've been told that Wiki tagging votes are only advisory and tha

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenRandomMap

2016-01-29 Thread Alex Barth
***OpenEpicMap*** On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Nick Whitelegg wrote: > > That is a lot of words in wordlist.txt! > > > Most amusing so far "OpenTrueToadMap" > > > Also got "OpenBarMap" and "OpenCentralParkMap" which sould real. > > > Nick > > > -- > *From:*

Re: [OSM-talk] Applicability of wiki tagging and votes: may, should or must

2016-01-29 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 19:50:11 + Andy Townsend wrote: > On 28/01/2016 19:16, David Marchal wrote: > > Hello, there. > > > > On a GitHub issue > > (https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2027#issuecomment-174443685), > > > > I've been told that Wiki tagging votes are only