Re: [OSM-talk] Need some help

2016-02-23 Thread Hans De Kryger
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Jo Walsh wrote: > > And isn't this the project that caused a lot of problems because the users > started adding all kind of services/shops/companies without a physical > presence to the OSM data ? [2] > > [1] http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=20859

Re: [OSM-talk] Reporting a potential vandal (bryanpiczon)

2016-02-23 Thread maning sambale
Thank you confirming bad edits in other areas. We will raise this to DWG now. On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Toby Murray wrote: > Most of the changesets I've looked at so far have been highly > suspicious and there is definitely a lot of damage to the map still > out there from this user. A fe

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] [Talk-us] license changes

2016-02-23 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Tuesday 23 February 2016, Simon Poole wrote: > > - review of the existing OSM community guidelines related to the ODbL > - ODbL review with an eye to a 1.1 release (gather points for > clarification and similar) > - review CC-BY 4.0 compatibility as an input licence to the ODbL > licensed databa