On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Jo Walsh wrote:
>
> And isn't this the project that caused a lot of problems because the users
> started adding all kind of services/shops/companies without a physical
> presence to the OSM data ? [2]
>
> [1] http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=20859
Thank you confirming bad edits in other areas. We will raise this to DWG now.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
> Most of the changesets I've looked at so far have been highly
> suspicious and there is definitely a lot of damage to the map still
> out there from this user. A fe
On Tuesday 23 February 2016, Simon Poole wrote:
>
> - review of the existing OSM community guidelines related to the ODbL
> - ODbL review with an eye to a 1.1 release (gather points for
> clarification and similar)
> - review CC-BY 4.0 compatibility as an input licence to the ODbL
> licensed databa
3 matches
Mail list logo