Hi,
On 10/15/2016 08:03 AM, Yves wrote:
> I personally find the 'negative magnifier' elegant, and the
> disappearance of the 0s and 1s a good way to simplify this logo and make
> it easier to scale.
I wonder what the established wisdom in the design community is about
this. I mean, many people vi
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Im not a designer, but standard wisdom on logos is something
that works at multiple scale with few substantial differences is b
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/14/2016 09:34 PM, Simon Poole wrote:
> > I suspect that was exactly the kind of thing Elio was trying to avoid
> .
> >
> > That said, I'm not convinced that yet another iteration of the
> > magnifying glass logo makes a lot
Hi
I find the proposed logo quite appealing. Well done. Nevertheless, I
argue against the magnifying glass
On 14/10/16 21:56, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> The magnifying glass is hard to explain when there's nothing
> under it but I think we have reached an age where it is ok to simply
> hold on to som
Normal practise is for the "marketing department" to have the logo
available in a selection of forms, for different purposes. Think of
different formats (square, 16:9, full-width banner etc), different
resolutions, different colour depths, perhaps a monochrome version etc.
In order to protect the "
On Saturday 15 October 2016, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> On 10/15/2016 08:03 AM, Yves wrote:
> > I personally find the 'negative magnifier' elegant, and the
> > disappearance of the 0s and 1s a good way to simplify this logo and
> > make it easier to scale.
>
> I wonder what the established wisdom in
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 15 ott 2016, alle ore 11:11, Frederik Ramm ha
> scritto:
>
> we could have a super crafty
> logo with gradients and shadows and a shiny 3D effect and so on.
we have this already :)
that's exactly our current logo
Cheers,
Martin
__
IMO The current logo works in large scale and 16x16 as well. I don’t know of
use cases where smaller is needed. Also the colours in the current logo is
pleasant to me, and represents a map. The 0’s and 1’s is a clear reference to
the digital database. I think if we need to simplify the current l
Most of what I agree with has already been said.
If any media, such as lo-fi print or t-shirts calls for a simplified
design, there's no problem going with it. This has been done. The good
thing about the general concept of our logo (lens+map) is that it will
be recognizable in either case. These c
Like it. As the current trends in graphic design go it fits right in.
Less clutter, flat, clear. Colours are nice, but would probably need
more discussion. A specific font for the word OpenStreetMap also makes
sense in terms of CI considerations.
I cannot comment on whether OSM needs a new logo or
10 matches
Mail list logo
