Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons, some notes

2017-03-19 Thread Andreas Vilén
To be fair, "the local community" in this case is probably mostly me and my interpretation of the Swedish community's reaction when someone tried to remove Corine imagery rather carelessly (introduced a lot of new errors) a couple of years ago. It's too bad that we're talking about a region when no

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons, some notes

2017-03-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 18 Mar 2017, at 21:40, Sandor Seres wrote: > > In another style, typical land related names are on the water like here > http://osm.org/go/0Tt1PZIt-?layers=T . seems like either a bad import or localities on the sea, e.g. here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/25351

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons, some notes

2017-03-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 19 Mar 2017, at 10:03, Andreas Vilén wrote: > > The main problem with Corine is that oftentimes the landuse data overlaps > villages (which I found when I mapped mountain villages in southern Spain > last week as well) whenever looking closeup at any corine data it w

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons, some notes

2017-03-19 Thread James
Also if I remember correctly the whole point was to optimize/be able to process osm data faster by not having to deal with so many errors(each case can slow down the processing) On Mar 19, 2017 7:23 AM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 19 Mar 2017, at 10:03, Andreas

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons, some notes

2017-03-19 Thread Mattias Dalkvist
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 18 Mar 2017, at 21:40, Sandor Seres wrote: > > In another style, typical land related names are on the water like here > http://osm.org/go/0Tt1PZIt-?layers=T . > > > seems like either a bad import or loc

Re: [OSM-talk] Responding to vandalism

2017-03-19 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Dave F wrote: > > On 16/03/2017 17:13, James wrote: > >> People can't even be bothered to review osmcha, you think people will >> want to approve changesets? >> >> > Could that be because it's not the very user friendly site? The filter > options are overly compl

Re: [OSM-talk] Responding to vandalism

2017-03-19 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Michael Reichert wrote: > I can second that. I did Pokémon cleaning in Germany. The majority of > them doesn't edit OSM a second time. > In defense of PoGo for a moment... I've actually been fairly impressed with this in my region. We've had a few new casual ma

Re: [OSM-talk] Responding to vandalism

2017-03-19 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > 2017-03-16 16:00 GMT-03:00 Mike N : > > On 3/16/2017 2:04 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > >> > >> And in vandalism, I would also distinguish between teenage doodles > >> ("penis! ha ha ha!"), and serious concerted efforts to harm OSM. > > > > >

Re: [OSM-talk] Responding to vandalism

2017-03-19 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Yves wrote: > Interesting, I didn't know such patrolling took place at a country scale > in OSM. Have you revert/re-map stats? > > However with your point 1)you have an idea. > How about a service rendering the area affected by an edit before 'commit'? > This prev

Re: [OSM-talk] Responding to vandalism

2017-03-19 Thread joost schouppe
> > > Now here what has to be done is an appropriate testing mechanism. > There are some functionality already done (like the one in Belgium), > but the problem is that everybody sees ALL last changes, there is no > way to SHARE the work of checking and you never know if somebody has > already chec

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons, some notes

2017-03-19 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Sunday 19 March 2017, Andreas Vilén wrote: > > Also, as has been pointed out earlier, Corine data might be bad, but > does not contain that many pure data errors as we define them. That is not quite accurate in my experience. As i explained in https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/20

Re: [OSM-talk] Responding to vandalism

2017-03-19 Thread Oleksiy Muzalyev
On 17.03.17 20:22, Jakob Mühldorfer wrote: Google tried to have restrictions on new editors The map got vandalised anyways and they shut down public editing So basically what others said, not in favour of any kind of restrictions. I also think it is impossible to stop vandalism by a single tech

Re: [OSM-talk] Responding to vandalism

2017-03-19 Thread Michael Andersen
Since it was first announced in october 2015, I have been watching the demo instance of https://github.com/MichaelVL/osm-analytic-tracker (developed by a fellow dane) almost daily and have found it immensely useful for keeping track of the activity in all of Denmark (the country north of Germany

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons, some notes

2017-03-19 Thread Andreas Vilén
There is a difference between data errors that the osmi will detect and bad quality map data. Corine is the latter. It's not up to me to decide if this data is to be deleted or not. If you want to do that, raise the question with each respective country's mailing list. /Andreas Skickat från mi

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons, some notes

2017-03-19 Thread Jochen Topf
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 06:27:05AM +0100, Andreas Vilén wrote: > It's not up to me to decide if this data is to be deleted or not. If > you want to do that, raise the question with each respective country's > mailing list. I was under the impression that were in contact with the Swedish community