The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 350,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things
happening in the openstreetmap world:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8950/
Enjoy!
weeklyOSM?
who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages
see my previous email about the root certificate authority not being a
trusted source of issuing certificates. Your connection is still encrypted
like a self-signed certificate, but because the browser hasn't added the
root CA to their list of trusted CAs that comply with the practices/audits
it te
I also got an invalid cert.
It used to be the case that cacert was good because it was free. But
with LetsEncrypt giving free ssl certs, there's no excuse anymore.
On 07.04.2017 13:35, john whelan wrote:
Worksforme
Whether it works or not is not the point. It definitely shows an
invalid cert
>Worksforme
Whether it works or not is not the point. It definitely shows an invalid
certificate for me. This is simply poor security practise.
Cheerio John
On 7 April 2017 at 07:21, Éric Gillet wrote:
> 2017-04-07 12:11 GMT+02:00 David Earl :
>
>> The link https://pads.ccc.de/k4rlFOGIHb repo
it's because http://www.CAcert.org(CAcert Inc.) is not in the recognized
issuers of your browser. It's like having a self-signed certificate.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Éric Gillet
wrote:
> 2017-04-07 12:11 GMT+02:00 David Earl :
>
>> The link https://pads.ccc.de/k4rlFOGIHb reports an inval
2017-04-07 12:11 GMT+02:00 David Earl :
> The link https://pads.ccc.de/k4rlFOGIHb reports an invalid https
> certificate!
>
Worksforme
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
The link https://pads.ccc.de/k4rlFOGIHb reports an invalid https
certificate!
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 at 11:55 Christoph Hormann wrote:
> On Thursday 06 April 2017, Simon Poole wrote:
> >
> > The other issue is brain storming is nice and so on, but you are
> > going to disappoint a fair number of pe
7 matches
Mail list logo
