On 02/10/2018 04:21, Paul Johnson wrote:
Only if the sender is sending from a server other than their normal mail
server, something readily detectable in the headers. Google seems to
use the same strategy as I did running my own mail server for about 12
years before moving to gsuite, which is
El mar., 2 de oct. de 2018 a la(s) 00:23, Paul Johnson
(ba...@ursamundi.org) escribió:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:09 PM Tom Hughes wrote:
>>
>> On 01/10/2018 19:54, Richard wrote:
>>
>> > The messages go straight into a dedicated gmail inbox without any
>> > filters.
>> > As far as I know gm
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:09 PM Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 01/10/2018 19:54, Richard wrote:
>
> > The messages go straight into a dedicated gmail inbox without any
> > filters.
> > As far as I know gmail will only ever reject messages that contain
> > what looks to it like executable programs - attach
It's not just that, but it's across a large number of gmail (or gsuite)
users, also meeting a certain ratio of users who reported what they got as
spam.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 2:03 PM James wrote:
> I get it too, it might be rejecting them because the mailing list is
> sending too many emails to
On 01/10/2018 19:54, Richard wrote:
The messages go straight into a dedicated gmail inbox without any
filters.
As far as I know gmail will only ever reject messages that contain
what looks to it like executable programs - attached files
(*.exe, *.com, *.bat)
It also rejects email from a sender
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:59:38PM -0400, James wrote:
> I get it too, it might be rejecting them because the mailing list is
> sending too many emails to too many gmail addresses(way to combat spam:
> limit same messages to different recipients)
hm.. receiving many Linux related maling lists and
I get them too. I've also remarked that i don't get messages from some
specific addresses.
By the way, when replying to a message on talk (but not on any other
list i'm subscribed to), the email client wants to reply to the
e-mail's sender instead of talk@openstreetmap.org. It would be helpful
if
On 18-10-01 20:54:13, Richard wrote:
Hi,
from time to time I am getting messages like
<>
Any idea.. what could be the cause? Unfortunately I don't see any way
to figure out which message did cause this.
I notice the first message I did not receive was
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail
On gmail I get the same from time to time.
Cheerio John
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018, 2:56 pm Richard, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> from time to time I am getting messages like
>
> < excessive bounces The last bounce received from you was dated
> 30-Sep-2018. >>
>
> Any idea.. what could be the cause? Unfortunat
I get it too, it might be rejecting them because the mailing list is
sending too many emails to too many gmail addresses(way to combat spam:
limit same messages to different recipients)
On Mon., Oct. 1, 2018, 2:56 p.m. Richard, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> from time to time I am getting messages like
>
> <
Hi,
from time to time I am getting messages like
<>
Any idea.. what could be the cause? Unfortunately I don't see any way
to figure out which message did cause this.
I notice the first message I did not receive was
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2018-September/081459.html
but
Do we really need yet another tool to find errors in HOT mapping?
Before the new version of task manager I did a lot of validation in HOT.
One of the problems on the data quality side is new mappers just don't
completely map a tile and mark it done for validation. Which means
finding their ne
On Mon, October 1, 2018 9:56 am, Nate Smith wrote:
>
> If you have some ideas on additional quality metrics we could add, that
> would be great as this tool is just getting started. I would definitely
> like to include more ways we can think about what quality data means
> during field mapping.
We
On Monday 01 October 2018, Nate Smith wrote:
> Thanks for the comment and questions Frederik. Agreed that quality
> and quantity isn’t exactly the same. And I hope that the UI in the
> tool hasn’t communicated that this is just about statistics and
> quantity - it is more than just a feature counte
Thanks for the comment and questions Frederik. Agreed that quality and
quantity isn’t exactly the same. And I hope that the UI in the tool hasn’t
communicated that this is just about statistics and quantity - it is more
than just a feature counter.
We certainly could say it is a richness monitor,
On Mon, October 1, 2018 7:57 am, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> On 01.10.2018 03:28, Nate Smith wrote:
>> Last week we released a new version
>> of a data quality monitoring tool
>
> I would like to recommend that you don't use the term "quality
> monitoring tool" for this since you're measuring quantity
16 matches
Mail list logo
