On 10/12/2018 19:33, Michael Reichert wrote:
> Did you consult the working group being involved in boundary
> disputes (DWG and LWG) before you came to that decision?
I'm not on the board but I can answer one of those - a statement was
issued to the DWG and LWG on Tuesday last week saying that
Is it serious or some joke/hoax?
Because making such decision would providing any justification at all would be
ridiculous.
10 Dec 2018, 17:55 by m...@rtijn.org:
>
> The Board decided that this decision is to be reversed and the previous
> situation, as laid out in the May 5, 2014 Data Working G
Dear board,
Am 10.12.18 um 18:14 schrieb Tom Hughes:
> On 10/12/2018 16:55, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>
>> On November 17, the OSMF Board of Directors received a request to
>> review the Nov 14, 2018 Data Working Group decision regarding Crimea.
>>
>> The Board decided that this decision is to be r
On Monday 10 December 2018, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>
> A more comprehensive statement will follow in the next weeks.
Transparency at work...
Like Tom i read this such as that you have decided on a desired result
but were not yet able to engineer a consistent reality around it.
Oh, the irony of
On 10/12/2018 16:55, Martijn van Exel wrote:
On November 17, the OSMF Board of Directors received a request to review the
Nov 14, 2018 Data Working Group decision regarding Crimea.
The Board decided that this decision is to be reversed and the previous
situation, as laid out in the May 5, 201
Hi all,
On November 17, the OSMF Board of Directors received a request to review the
Nov 14, 2018 Data Working Group decision regarding Crimea.
The Board decided that this decision is to be reversed and the previous
situation, as laid out in the May 5, 2014 Data Working Group minutes, is to
fu
6 matches
Mail list logo
