On 2018-12-19 11:25 p.m., Maarten Deen wrote:
And the image is not entirely wrong, it's an example of a reversible
oneway street.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lions_Gate_Bridge
The Lions Gate Bridge and Stanley Park causeway are not one-way. The
middle lane switches direction, but there is
On 2018-12-19 22:30, Richard wrote:
the example image in
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway%3Dreversible
is clearly wrong but aparently isn't mentioned referenced anywhere in
the source
of the page. Am I blind?
Does it perhaps come from
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q57
Hi,
the example image in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway%3Dreversible
is clearly wrong but aparently isn't mentioned referenced anywhere in the
source
of the page. Am I blind?
Does it perhaps come from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q5736 ??
How the hell can I get rid
On Wednesday 19 December 2018, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> bist Du nicht im advisory board? Hast Du mind 1 Eur bezahlt?
> Kommt mir unwahrscheinlich vor ;-) Oder bringe ich da was
> durcheinander?
I am on the AB because the FOSSGIS sent me there (and neither i not the
FOSSGIS paid anything
Am Mi., 19. Dez. 2018 um 11:28 Uhr schrieb Simon Poole :
> Please get your quotes correct.
mea culpa, they must have changed something in the UI :o
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Please get your quotes correct.
On 19.12.2018 10:51, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Hallo Christoph,
>
> bist Du nicht im advisory board? Hast Du mind 1 Eur bezahlt? Kommt mir
> unwahrscheinlich vor ;-)
> Oder bringe ich da was durcheinander?
>
> Gruß, Martin
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 19.
sending again
sent from a phone
> On 19. Dec 2018, at 09:33, Ervin Malicdem wrote:
>
> But still, the issue remains that when the community does not care about
> these violations, then we are prone to such instance over and over.
I wholeheartedly agree, people traditionally had not to fear
Hallo Christoph,
bist Du nicht im advisory board? Hast Du mind 1 Eur bezahlt? Kommt mir
unwahrscheinlich vor ;-)
Oder bringe ich da was durcheinander?
Gruß, Martin
sent from a phone
> On 19. Dec 2018, at 10:42, Simon Poole wrote:
>
> A seat on the advisory board requires at least a "gol
The LWG has added a work item for 2019 to update the guidance on
attribution. The major part of the existing texts were written in the
ramp up to the licence change in 2012 and are now over 6 years old.
Lots of things have changed massively since then, be it the scope of OSM
usage, to what kind o
Hi,
On 19.12.2018 09:33, Ervin Malicdem wrote:
> I just hoped before they were given a seat as part of OSMF's ADVISORY
> board, these issues had been handled. 500 euros seems to clear all that
> history so soon.
A seat on the advisory board requires at least a "gold" level membership
which costs
They have been known NOT to attribute OSM since over 4 years back. [1]
Unfortunately, our community leaders back then is more assertive in
other ways than those who potentially violate the attribution guidelines.
They were notified but instead of replying back for a resolution, they
ceased using t
11 matches
Mail list logo
