Re: [OSM-talk] Jhulto Pul/ Morbi bridge

2022-11-12 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Nov 12, 2022, 11:18 by marc_m...@mailo.com: >> The reverting changeset >> > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604295549 > highway=construction for a very damaged bridge is very strange, > it look like tagging for the render > I am also unsure, but unfamiliar with situation. Maybe  reconstruc

Re: [OSM-talk] Jhulto Pul/ Morbi bridge

2022-11-12 Thread Andy Townsend
On 12/11/2022 13:51, Andy Mabbett wrote: I'm not in the least precious about how it is tagged, so long as the fact that a structure still bridges the river, but is impassable to pedestrians, is recorded. (and earlier) If I knew how to revert the edit I would do so; I do not. Can someone do t

Re: [OSM-talk] Jhulto Pul/ Morbi bridge

2022-11-12 Thread Andy Mabbett
On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 at 10:18, Marc_marc wrote: > > > The reverting changeset > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604295549 > highway=construction for a very damaged bridge is very strange, > it look like tagging for the render I'm not in the least precious about how it is tagged, so long as the

Re: [OSM-talk] Jhulto Pul/ Morbi bridge

2022-11-12 Thread Marc_marc
The reverting changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604295549 highway=construction for a very damaged bridge is very strange, it look like tagging for the render ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/list