Le 10 janvier 2023 08:12:43 GMT+01:00, Snusmumriken
a écrit :
>On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 23:06 +, Andy Townsend wrote:
>> On 09/01/2023 20:17, Snusmumriken wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 08:21 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> > > You seem unwilling to understand that defining a way to refer to
>
On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 23:06 +, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 09/01/2023 20:17, Snusmumriken wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 08:21 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
> > > You seem unwilling to understand that defining a way to refer to
> > > ids
> > > will cause social pressure not to change ids,
> > Is th
Snusmumriken writes:
> On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 08:21 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>>
>> You seem unwilling to understand that defining a way to refer to ids
>> will cause social pressure not to change ids,
>
> Is there actually evidence that would corroborate this claim?
Do you mean like actually
On 09/01/2023 20:17, Snusmumriken wrote:
On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 08:21 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
You seem unwilling to understand that defining a way to refer to ids
will cause social pressure not to change ids,
Is there actually evidence that would corroborate this claim?
There have definitely
On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 08:21 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> You seem unwilling to understand that defining a way to refer to ids
> will cause social pressure not to change ids,
Is there actually evidence that would corroborate this claim?
___
talk mail
Le 9 janvier 2023 16:19:14 GMT+01:00, Niels Elgaard Larsen a
écrit :
>
>I sometimes do get annoyed at especially new mappers that often
>excessively delete and recreates objects. Because it obscures the
>history.
>
If it is a trend for new mappers, which I understand well because sometimes it
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 08:21:42 -0500
Greg Troxel wrote:
>Sören Reinecke writes:
>
>> Using osm id is far from ideal but it is sufficient enough. If POI
>> owners are using OSM data, they will likely also pay attention to the
>> osm entry they have to keep it updated. So they will notice any
>> cha
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 at 17:57, Sören Reinecke wrote:
> It came into my mind to get IETF to standardize a parameter explicitly
> linking to
> osm objects with their corresponding type and id.
1) Do we have any indication that IETF would be willing to
"standardize a parameter" for an ID scheme used
Sören Reinecke writes:
> Using osm id is far from ideal but it is sufficient enough. If POI
> owners are using OSM data, they will likely also pay attention to the
> osm entry they have to keep it updated. So they will notice any
> change.
You seem unwilling to understand that defining a way to
9 matches
Mail list logo
