Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Trolley)

2010-04-30 Thread Adrien Pavie
Simone Saviolo wrote : 2010/4/30 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com: [...] consider bicycle=yes. [...] I sense a long and unproductive discussion approaching. ;-) Simone I'm agree, there's other things about the tag who need to be fixed, like the name and the way to tag (between tag

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC -(Trolley)

2010-04-29 Thread Adrien Pavie
Alex S. wrote : Since it's been brought up, how about a tag/sub-tag for handbaskets? It would be just as nice to know if the local bodega/mini-mart/c-store have them before leaving the house. I suggest a separate tag, but it's a good idea, if this was not proposed or adopted why not =) And

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Trolley)

2010-04-28 Thread Adrien Pavie
Liz wrote : What about airport trolleys/carts/trundlers? Mapping the location of those would be useful. Yes, good idea. At first I don't think about airports but there's equelly trolleys. But in this case, the tag become more general and the proposition for the name shop:cart is

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Trolley)

2010-04-28 Thread Adrien Pavie
John Smith wrote : On 28 April 2010 22:14, Adrien Pavie dr...@laposte.net wrote: Yes, good idea. At first I don't think about airports but there's equelly trolleys. But in this case, the tag become more general and the proposition for the name shop:cart is unadapted... So for the names

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Trolley)

2010-04-28 Thread Adrien Pavie
Pieren wrote : Besides the question of tagging such things, OSM has a long tradition of using the english words for the tags, not the US. This is because the project has been founded there. I don't see why we should change now because you read one complain from Australia and two from US...

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Trolley)

2010-04-28 Thread Adrien Pavie
John F. Eldredge wrote : Speaking as an American, I think that amenity=shopping_trolley would be sufficient to tell people that we aren't talking about trolley cars (street railways), and it wouldn't be hard to learn the meaning of shopping trolley. So, a tag like shop:trolley=yes/no could

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC -(Trolley)

2010-04-28 Thread Adrien Pavie
John F. Eldredge wrote: Well, we could always use handcart, rather than cart, so as to specify that we don't mean the horse-drawn variety. When it's not tramways or electric trains, it's horses x) I see in my dictionnary french-english (I didn't have an english dictionnary with definitions)

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC -(Trolley)

2010-04-28 Thread Adrien Pavie
John F. Eldredge wrote : English has a proverbial expression, going to hell in a handbasket, meaning that things are going wrong at a rapid pace. Hmm... =/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Trolley)

2010-04-27 Thread Adrien Pavie
Claudius wrote : And by the way: I suggest using yes/no as values instead of the computer science lingo true/false. Yes/no was what I choose when i create the wiki page, but yes/no is already used by access tag for the restrictions on roads.. and I've looked somewhere in the wiki it's

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Trolley)

2010-04-26 Thread Adrien Pavie
Alex S. : Why would shops have light-rail trains? Yes, it's for shopping cart or caddie, trains in a shop could be strange ^^'. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Trolley)

2010-04-26 Thread Adrien Pavie
Aun Johnsen wrote : 1) I do not see the point in this tag, 99% of supermarkets and grocery stores world wide have some form of carts available for its customers, the few exemptions I have seen are shops that are too small, or shops where you ask for the groceries directly over the counter.

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Trolley)

2010-04-26 Thread Adrien Pavie
Don't forget that we already use the scheme vehicle=yes/no/designated/maybe/... to express access restrictions for modes of transport - so cart=no actually means no shopping cart riding allowed in here ;-) -Martin Ok, I will change it in the wiki, shop:cart=true/false and the other

[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Trolley)

2010-04-25 Thread Adrien Pavie
. Adrien Pavie (alias Dri60) ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk