Ben Laenen wrote:
> I beg to differ here. When you have to tag cycleways belonging to a road
> not as "highway=whatever, cycleway=track" but as
> separate "highway=cycleway" they just become an editing mess,
> especially at intersections.
Yes, but this is also the reality for cyclists. Everyth
Sven Grüner wrote:
> Being considered a fanatical biker by my friends as well I share that
> believe.
;-)
> This worked fine when focussing on car-traffic but when we really want
> to provide high-quility (usable for routing/navigation) data of footways
> and cycleways I'm afraid we need a differ
Karl Newman wrote:
> I don't know why everyone's opposed to left/right. It's unambiguous,
> and properly structured it would not be difficult for
> editors to accommodate it.
Hmm, IMO neither north/south, nor left/right are a good solution for
this problem. The only clean solution would be a re
Karl Newman wrote:
> You still haven't solved the left/right problem. For example, house
> numbers are commonly even on one side and odd on the other.
Not in Braunschweig: Many of our streets are numbered this way:
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - [...] - 131
== \
[...] 136 - 135
Lambertus wrote:
> Your suggestions are great, it would be nice to be able to classify ways
> with properties like e.g. nice scenery, low traffic, smooth surface,
> etc.
Yes, something like that. The user interface could probably
have some kind of switch or slider:
[---
5 matches
Mail list logo
