Re: [OSM-talk] Why newbies' comment/message response rate is so low?

Michał Brzozowski wrote > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Gerd Petermann > < > GPetermann_muenchen@ > > wrote: >> I think that's quite okay presuming that many users don't speak english > I forgot to mention. My operations with respect to newcomers are > almost solely in Poland. So I write in Po

Re: [OSM-talk] Undiscussed (?) edits removing lesser-used highway=* tags

Andy Townsend wrote >> Will this be frustrating for any mapper? I doubt that. > > We need to think a little beyond people who know about "nodes", "ways" > and "relations" here. Anything that says "you can't do that because" > had better be really clear about what the problem is (and not use wor

Re: [OSM-talk] Undiscussed (?) edits removing lesser-used highway=* tags

lsces wrote > On 10/11/15 10:08, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> One of the great strengths of OSM is that you can invent tagging on >> the >> fly and trying to suppress that just so that the data consumers have >> it >> easy, is misguided. In the end the main way our tagging evolves is b

Re: [OSM-talk] Undiscussed (?) edits removing lesser-used highway=* tags

es to the node which connects the highway with the waterway. greetings, Gerd (GerdP) -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-tp5859298p5859435.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.