Alan Mintz wrote: > I've seen no such demonstration of desire. The only thing we real > mappers are discussing is anxiety over exactly what will happen and > when, and the huge amount of data that is tainted and will be lost when > this thing is shoved down our throats.
For what it's worth, I am a real mapper, and I do not feel anything being shoved down my throat. Of course, I am also anxious about the amount of change, but I am sure we mappers can cope with the remapping in a relatively short time. > Is this really the problem? Have we been "barking up the wrong tree?" Yes. And too late. > The osmf-talk list isn't even in the list of lists - you have to know it's > there You get subscribed to it automatically when you become a member of OSMF (at least I did). Please note that I am in no way associated with the "evil" board or anything other in the core of OSMF. I simply joined because I am a mapper and wanted to support the project financially and have a bit of influence. Perhaps you should join, too? http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Join Complaining about the OSMF's decisions without being a member seems a bit odd to me. - Jørgen P.S Also sorry for the crosspostings. I Recommend FUT talk@openstreetmap.org only. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk