> is anyone contributing to OpenStreetMap by using Tor? (the onion router)
if i where sitting in china, mapping for OSM, i would certainly use tor for
this...
-jha-
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listin
> Komzpa is out of reach of Russian state authorities. Russian citizens are
> not. That is the only thing I wanted to tell specifing that he is from
> Belorussia.
Official german map providers have a very nice tagging for military areas and
other not public areas "owned" by the gouvernment, the
> military, but it is used/guarded by them. It would surprise me if there are
> no signs to tell you it is something to do by the military.
There are nice echelon sites in germany which just have high fences and signs
warning about high voltage.
But plate stating something about military or use
> That's a good summation of the reasoning for an evolving license.
I consider evolving licenses as evil blank cheques.
("i agree to this version of licence and any future version relased by
$FOUNDATION")
Even if there is preamble saying "all future versions will be in the same
faith like th
> Thanks for the explanations and clarifications. One question remains
> from me: what steps are being taken to avoid OSM users committing
> unnecessary wilful trademark infringement at this time?
The very plane question for me is:
Can i still offer OSM-stickers and T-shirts on a public website f
> Got it !
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Openstreetmap_logo.svg
The copyright of the OSM-Logo itself is CC-sa-by?
-jha-
___
legal-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
> Someone is bound to say "eTrex Legend HCx" so let me be the first.
Don't do that.
I own one and can definitly say: The receiver is VERY crappy
in terms of accuracy. As i use this device (Vista HCx) for
geocaching, i was rather unsatisfied with the recorded
tracks when i started comparing
[..Proposal for bots..]
I completly agree.
> 2. Make sure your tools and knowledge are good: You have to be able to
> revert your changes if something goes wrong, and you need to keep any
> collateral damage to an absolute minimum. If you cannot guarantee that,
> ask someone for help who can.
Is
> And what about the source tag? Some special one? Or simply
> source=geoserwer.pl or better source=techmex s.a.?
If he want's an attribution inside our database, you have to
ask HIM.
But if the topic is not already on the agenda or explicitly
unclear: Do not trigger the topic.
Otherwise you
> They: Yes, if the product created by you does not contain any part or
> all of our orthophotomaps and it wont be posssible to obtain from the
> file our orthophotomaps (clearly - the layers must be seperated)."
> What do you think about this?
It sounds fair.
He does not forbid derived artwork
10 matches
Mail list logo
