Re: [OSM-talk-be] Donation with tax certificate

Hello, Do you know where we can read more about the procedure and conditions to receive approval by the KBF ? Thx. ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Banque de France

LOI n° 93-980 du 4 août 1993 relative au statut de la Banque de France et à l'activité et au contrôle des établissements de crédit Art. 17. - Peuvent être titulaires de comptes à la Banque de France : 1° Les organismes régis par les dispositions de la loi n° 84-46 du 24 janvier 1984 relative à

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Relations pour établissement d'enseignement ?

From the wiki: “ For schools with multiple sites the multipolygon relation can be used. “ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon On May 17, 2019, at 11:42, deuzeffe wrote: Hello, Soit un établissement d'enseignement,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Dépose-minute

Les emplacements K qui me viennent à l'esprit sont signalés avec des panneaux P, ce qui fait penser qu'amenity=parking est approprié. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Les maternités ?

Pas certain... amenity=hospital + healthcare=maternity ? On 3/12/19, 09:30 Mathias Vadot wrote: Bonjour, je n'ai pas trouvé le tag correspondant aux maternités sur les différentes pages du wiki. Sur Paris j'ai bien trouvé une maternité mais non

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Les contours de la Bretagne

Sinon, on peut cartographier des mondes fictifs sur OpenGeoFiction... :-) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenGeofiction___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] ça veut dire quoi ça :

Concernant le mot de passe, il y a un avetissement clair lors de l’inscription: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr. Bounce mail sont des situations d’erreur rencontrées par ton fournisseur de mail: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounce_message. Les raisons peuvent varier, comme

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Imprimer un plan à partir d'OSM ?

Est-ce que ceci est utile ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_on_Paper From: pepilepi...@ovh.fr [mailto:pepilepi...@ovh.fr] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 18:50 To: talk-fr@openstreetmap.org Subject: [OSM-talk-fr] Imprimer

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Cimetière militaire

Voir cette discussion récente sur les carrés confessionnels: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2018-December/091336.html.___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Et OSM la dedans !

> Il y a déjà du cross-post Twitter > Mastodon sur le compte > https://fr.osm.social/@osm_fr > Ce n'est pas parfait, mais ça permet d'avancer. Pourquoi ne pas inverser le flux: poster sur Mastodon et reposter sur Twitter ? C’est peut-être symbolique, mais ça permet de faire connaître le compte

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Portillon : entrance, gate, barrier, autre ?

Dans le cas de barrier=entrance, il s’agit d’une ouverture, le passage est libre, il n’y a pas de barrière. Je ne vois pas entrance=gate dans le wiki, et je trouverais ça bizarre parce qu’entrance decrit l’utilité de l’entrée, pas tellement son dispositif. Donc, reste barrier=gate pour décrire

Re: [OSM-talk-be] arlon - osm - training courses

Thanks for the report. ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] "Give Box", Boîte à Dons

Il y a une proposition amenity=reuse: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Reuse.___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-be] OSM.be versus OpenStreetMap.be

So, it's rather consistent. Thx for the check. ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] OSM.be versus OpenStreetMap.be

It’s fine as long as it’s consistent and predictable for the user. If a regional domain shows a map and another the chapter info, it can be confusing. ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] OSM.be versus OpenStreetMap.be

Second thoughts... When you visit a .com website, which also has an affiliated regional website, like .be, you expect to find the same stuff but in the local language and with local products. By the logic above, openstreetmap.be should show the map centered on Belgium. In the case of

Re: [Talk-transit] [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables

> Even if you can make it fit, it's not necessarily a good idea to do it. > I'm thinking of the Hoover Dustette. Excuse my ignorance. You’re thinking to what ? > I'm not sure that a wiki would be the optimal architecture for this if we > ended up with many GTFS feeds that were interrogated

Re: [Talk-transit] [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables

(Re-posting because I accidentally dropped talk-transit) On Nov 8, 2018, at 00:30, OSMDoudou <19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote: Just a quick web search, but it appears there exist GTFS editors and there is an entire ecosystem around creating and hosting GFTS files

Re: [Talk-transit] [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables

(Re-posting because I accidentally dropped talk-transit) On Nov 8, 2018, at 00:18, OSMDoudou <19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote: > And it's re-inventing the wheel. GTFS already exists. > Could we do better? Maybe, maybe not. Indeed. If someone determines

Re: [OSM-talk-be] OSM.be versus OpenStreetMap.be

+1 ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

[OSM-talk-be] ING is using OpenStreetMap

Hello, I incidentally found this. Thanks to GDPR, we now know that ING is using OpenStreetMap internally: - "ING also collects data by consulting external sources. These may be (.) OpenStreetMap and other search engines in connection with marketing" [1] - "Some specific personal data may

Re: [OSM-talk-be] temporary cycle routes

I don't know the details of this particular case, but if there is a real intention to be built the route, then why not map it as future ? OMS has tags to manage the life-cycle of past, present and future features. From: Tim Couwelier [mailto:tim.couwel...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday,

Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] Way access mismatch relation route=bicycle

ussion on the ring around Roeselare on the Riot/Matrix channel. Maybe it's time we rewrite the Belgian highway classification page to indicate that Nxxx & Rxxx are just indications for mapping and that traffic signs and road importance take precedence ? m On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:44 AM,

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Where to suggest/discuss the renderer?

I don't know for sure, but the rendering on openstreetmap.org is called OpenStreetMap Carto and to request improvement I think you file a bug report on their github. [1] See also [2] and notice the brief "Reporting Issues" guidance mentions providing a screenshot and a link. [2] [1]

Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] Way access mismatch relation route=bicycle

to be an F9 sign. If not, it is a primary. regards m On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:24 AM, OSMDoudou <19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Can you help with the B) part of the discussion ? > > What highway value is suitable for R50 ? > &g

Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] Way access mismatch relation route=bicycle

e are "no-bicycle" sign along the ring road, except for this short piece. Your second point regarding the road classification trunk is a different issue, that needs to be discussed with the Belgian community. [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions