not then
it might be possible, but I'll have to look into it. Send me the
details anyway.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian Haylock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All edits are logged against the user id of the uploader anyway, so
that doesn't gain you anything
Is this true with potatch as well ?
Yes.
Just curious, but what would
be suggesting blink next ;-)
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
zoomed out to show the whole world
and there are three hundred attribution strings to display by the
way? It might be quite hard to see the map with them all displayed...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
talk mailing
was basing it
on using a planet dump, but if you have an osm file then you should
be able to use that instead.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi
and time
frame.
All edits are logged against the user id of the uploader anyway, so
that doesn't gain you anything (wikipedia does it because it allows
anonymous edits).
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian Haylock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And what has / is being done about it ?
We're waiting for somebody to write code to group edits into
changesets and allow them to be rolled back.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu
find it hard to believe that
user=jos逴巜¯(R)退 (from the API) is correct.
The name doesn't make any more sense in a mysql command line, so I
don't think it's an osmosis problem.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
talk
cats on the list in terms of dates, but ideas for
locations appreciated.
Have a +1 from me for that idea.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
the debate is here:
http://www.archive.org/details/Sotm07PanelDebate-LicensingOsmData
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
).
That and the the fact that it took forever to generate. The bzip one
is bad enough, 7zip was worse. For a full planet the time is measured
in hours, not minutes.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk
one anyway
as it's only used to upgrade existing data.
In fact I thought I fixed the migration scripts to work without it now
so long as you don't have any data in the relevant tables?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu
. It is purely about establishing a z-ordering for
objects. If it's in a tunnel we should say so explicitly.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin
Line when I was tidying that up.
It should be railway=subway of course, not railway=rail.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman
guessed, you haven't made your edits public.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
and use the results.
I'm not sure if npemaps queries FTP in real time though, or if they
have a cached copy of the FTP database that might be out of date?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Chance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the status of this? I've put about lots of codes around my area
into FreeThePostcode, but when I search for my flat's code
way, it seems to leave the old
segment in place, so you have to find that in JOSM and delete it;
If it's doing that then it's a bug, but I'm pretty sure it isn't
anymore.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB
901 - 918 of 918 matches
Mail list logo