On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you instead give the customer a heavily DRMed and encrypted version
of your data, together with some decryption/processing software and with
an OSM data file, and make it so that the PDF is generated on the
customer's
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Rob Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BY-SA 2.0 section 3.d allows you to distribute copies or phonorecords
of, display publicly, perform publicly, and perform publicly by means
of a digital audio transmission Derivative Works
Hi,
Nic Roets wrote:
Unless local law explicitly allows you to create derivative works for your
own use.
You don't need local law; CC-BY-SA section 3 b. says that you are
allowed to *create* derivative works in any case, and then goes on with
restrictions (section 4) about distributing and
IANAL, TINLA.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My example above did *not* contain distribution of any OSM-derived work.
The items that were distributed were (a) proprietary software, (b)
proprietary data, and (c) unaltered OSM data.
(c) is distribution
Hi,
say you have a super-secret database with property prices that you
only want to give to paying customers.
Say you want to offer your customers to combine this with OpenStreetMap
data, and ultimately make a PDF paper that has some coloured maps in it.
By the current license, if you
In the case where the super-secret database owner does not encourage you to
use OSM-ng license data, there is nothing the license can do. The
super-secret database owner can simply argue that his software was written
for OSM/PD or OSM/CC-by-SA.
Another way frustrate SA will be to reduce the
Hi,
Rob Myers wrote:
My example above did *not* contain distribution of any OSM-derived work.
The items that were distributed were (a) proprietary software, (b)
proprietary data, and (c) unaltered OSM data.
(c) is distribution of the original work and so is still covered by
the licence,
7 matches
Mail list logo
