Am 02.10.2010 14:36, schrieb Valent Turkovic:
Here is his answer:
Those countries have their own geogrphical or geodesist institutes. So:
the VGI is selling those OLD prints and they have still an copyright on
reproduction of those papers, BUT NOT THE CONTAINED DATA !!!
The fact that the
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Ulf Möller o...@ulfm.de wrote:
Am 02.10.2010 14:36, schrieb Valent Turkovic:
I agree that it is a grey zone, but who will say that its illegal?
OSM doesn't accept data from grey zones
It'll be interesting to see how the ODbL switchover takes place, then.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Valent Turkovic
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 08:21:12 +0200,
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just an observation :
These maps look just like if not identical to the russian topographical
maps. mike
Are russian topographical maps
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:09 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
that is another contentious issue, they are defactor public domain IMHO.
mike
AFAIK, not in Russia.
___
legal-talk mailing list
Just an observation :
These maps look just like if not identical to the russian topographical maps.
mike
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Matija Nalis mnalis-n...@voyager.hr wrote:
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 09:41:00 +0100, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 October 2010 23:29,
Hi,
On 10/03/2010 04:31 AM, John Smith wrote:
None of those examples applies since it was a question about copyright
ownership.
I don't see why we should treat a nation state's laws about copyright
any different than a nation state's idiosyncratic laws about maps or
surveying. If you are in
On 2 October 2010 23:29, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
I think that the argument is not that.
The argument is really
'Is the Serbian government the legal successor of the Yugoslav government
in Serbian territories?'
Would an international court give the rights to the Serbian government?
I think
On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 17:48:39 +0200, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 10/02/2010 03:43 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
This is pretty clear, then: OSM also needs to be usable on Serbian territory,
so it can't use the maps.
Right... and OSM needs to be usable in India too, so it must show
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 09:41:00 +0100, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 October 2010 23:29, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
The argument is really
'Is the Serbian government the legal successor of the Yugoslav government
in Serbian territories?'
If (say) Serbia were to use OSMF or an OSM
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:02:16 +, Ed Avis wrote:
Or does srpskicrv mean that the mapping agency of Serbia is the only
entity that claims copyright, and further that it has released the maps
to the public domain?
Here is his answer:
Okay, even if I dont have time (this is the
10 matches
Mail list logo
