Mike Collinson m...@... writes:
- When enough contributors have agreed, we cut over to licensing the current
database under ODbL, (And a static snapshot of the database is also made
forever
under CC-BY-SA). If for some reason this event never happens, the fail safe is
that licensing of all
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Mike Collinson m...@... writes:
- When enough contributors have agreed, we cut over to licensing the current
database under ODbL, (And a static snapshot of the database is also made
forever
under CC-BY-SA). If for some reason
I am pleased to announce that we went live today with new contributor terms,
for NEW contributors and we already have contributors signed up. OpenStreetMap
has NOT yet moved to the new license.
A copy of the terms can be viewed here,
On 12/05/10 16:23, Jochen Topf wrote:
This puts the OSMF in a unique position to undermine the whole project. If
somebody subverts the OSMF, he can do whatever he wants with the data. I don't
think its a good idea to expose the OSMF to even the possibility of that
happening. The whole point
On 12/05/10 16:23, Jochen Topf wrote:
This puts the OSMF in a unique position to undermine the whole project. If
somebody subverts the OSMF, he can do whatever he wants with the data. I
don't
think its a good idea to expose the OSMF to even the possibility of that
happening. The whole
At 04:28 PM 12/05/2010, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 12/05/10 16:23, Jochen Topf wrote:
This puts the OSMF in a unique position to undermine the whole project. If
somebody subverts the OSMF, he can do whatever he wants with the data. I don't
think its a good idea to expose the OSMF to even the
At 04:37 PM 12/05/2010, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Now saying new contributors have to agree to the CC-By-SA and ODbL is
a little unprecise. I thought that was the case based on the two mail
announcements sent today, but it's the Contributor Terms, not ODbL
based on what Avar reports.
I may be
7 matches
Mail list logo
