On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Robert (Jamie) Munro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy answered that in the message you are replying to, but you edited
his answer out.
D'oh. Sorry about that. :-(
- Rob.
___
legal-talk mailing list
Hi All,
I was recently, umm, persuaded to join this ML - clearly I did
something wrong in a previous life :-) Forgive me if the following is
inappropriate or has been discussed already, so far I've only been
subjected to vast torrents of PD discussions so I'm not sure what goes
on at other times!
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it an intended side effect of the license to discourage
internet-based distribution of derivative dbs?
I wouldn't have thought so. :-)
My suggestion would be
that recovering reasonable production cost should also be
Hi,
Andy Allan wrote:
OSM data is large and growing
quickly, and bandwidth isn't free, certainly not at this scale.
Good point, should be fixed.
I guess the phrase came in because people had in mind the sometimes
frivolous use of freedom-of-information-act liberty to charge for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Myers wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it an intended side effect of the license to discourage
internet-based distribution of derivative dbs?
I wouldn't have thought so. :-)
My suggestion
5 matches
Mail list logo
