On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Viernes, 31 de Octubre de 2008, Sunburned Surveyor escribió:
> [...]
>> Does the new license ever require my company to release the land use
>> polygon data in the above scenario?
>
> No.
:-)
I think however a us
Hi,
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> Does the new license ever require my company to release the land use
> polygon data in the above scenario?
As long as you don't use anything from OSM, no OSM license in the world
can force you to do anything.
The fact that you have contributed something to OSM is
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> Does the new license ever require my company to release the land use
> polygon data in the above scenario?
No.
> In essence my company would be "dual licensing" the road centerline
> data.
Indeed. Lots of us already dual-license our contributions to OSM:
http://wiki
El Viernes, 31 de Octubre de 2008, Sunburned Surveyor escribió:
[...]
> Does the new license ever require my company to release the land use
> polygon data in the above scenario?
No.
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber:[EMAI
I've been encouraged to try and address my concerns with the new
license, as an alternative to pushing foward with the release of my
OSM data into the public domain. There is really one aspect of the new
license that is my biggest concern. I want to make sure that I
understand the issue properly, a
5 matches
Mail list logo