Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Understanding the new license - room for negotiation?

2008-10-31 Thread Andy Allan
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Iván Sánchez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Viernes, 31 de Octubre de 2008, Sunburned Surveyor escribió: > [...] >> Does the new license ever require my company to release the land use >> polygon data in the above scenario? > > No. :-) I think however a us

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Understanding the new license - room for negotiation?

2008-10-31 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > Does the new license ever require my company to release the land use > polygon data in the above scenario? As long as you don't use anything from OSM, no OSM license in the world can force you to do anything. The fact that you have contributed something to OSM is

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Understanding the new license - room for negotiation?

2008-10-31 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > Does the new license ever require my company to release the land use > polygon data in the above scenario? No. > In essence my company would be "dual licensing" the road centerline > data. Indeed. Lots of us already dual-license our contributions to OSM: http://wiki

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Understanding the new license - room for negotiation?

2008-10-31 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El Viernes, 31 de Octubre de 2008, Sunburned Surveyor escribió: [...] > Does the new license ever require my company to release the land use > polygon data in the above scenario? No. -- -- Iván Sánchez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber:[EMAI

[OSM-legal-talk] Understanding the new license - room for negotiation?

2008-10-31 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
I've been encouraged to try and address my concerns with the new license, as an alternative to pushing foward with the release of my OSM data into the public domain. There is really one aspect of the new license that is my biggest concern. I want to make sure that I understand the issue properly, a